Saturday, November 26, 2005

THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR - Number 607

"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR"
An International Newsletter
The Latest, Up-To-Date
In-Depth Ukrainian News, Analysis, and Commentary

"Ukrainian History, Culture, Arts, Business, Religion,
Sports, Government, and Politics, in Ukraine and Around the World"

INTERNATIONAL DAY OF MEMORY - UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE
The Holodomor - "Famine-Terror Death for Millions" 1932-1933
Worldwide "Light-A-Candle" Campaign
Saturday, November 26, 2005


33,000 CANDLES TO LIGHT UP NIGHT SKY IN KYIV IN
REMEMBRANCE OF MILLIONS OF VICTIMS OF UKRAINIAN
GENOCIDE-HOLODOMOR-DEATH BY TERROR-FAMINE

33,000 Ukrainians were dying every day at the height of the
genocidal famine in the Spring of 1933

"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR" - Number 607
Mr. E. Morgan Williams, Publisher and Editor
FROM: KYIV, UKRAINE, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2005

--------INDEX OF ARTICLES--------
"Major International News Headlines and Articles"

1. 33,000 CANDLES TO LIGHT UP NIGHT SKY IN KYIV IN
REMEMBRANCE OF MILLIONS OF VICTIMS OF UKRAINIAN
GENOCIDE-HOLODOMOR-DEATH BY TERROR-FAMINE
E. Morgan Williams, Publisher and Editor
The Action Ukraine Report (AUR)
Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, November 26, 2005

2. PRESIDENT OPENS EXHIBITION TO HONOR FAMINE VICTIMS
Press office of President Victor Yushchenko of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

3. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT YUSHCHENKO CALLS ON WORLD
TO RECOGNIZE SOVIET-ERA FAMINE AS GENOCIDE
Associated Press (AP), Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

4. 'PEOPLE WERE EATING PEOPLE'
Survivors recall 1932-1933 famine in Ukraine with horror and tears
By Nick Martin, The Winnipeg Free Press
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Monday, November 21, 2005

5. LITHUANIAN SEJM RECOGNIZES FAMINE OF 1932-1933
IN UKRAINE AS GENOCIDE
Interfax-Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

6. UKRAINIAN DIASPORA IN RUSSIA TO MARK DAY OF
MEMORY OF FAMINE AND POLITICAL REPRESSION VICTIMS
ON NOVEMBER 26
Tatyana Gordiyenko, Ukrinform, Kyiv, Ukraine, Fri, Nov 25, 2005

7. DAY OF FAMINE VICTIMS MARKED IN BELARUS
Ukrinform, Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

8. UKRAINIAN AUSTRALIANS CALL FOR CITIZENS TO LIGHT A
CANDLE ON SUN, NOV 27 TO COMMEMORATE THE MILLIONS
WHO PERISHED IN THE GREAT UKRAINIAN FAMINE
(HOLODOMOR), AN ACT OF GENOCIDE IN 1932-1933.
Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organizations
Representing 24 Peak Ukrainian Organizations in Australia
Member of Ukrainian World Congress
Australia, Saturday, November 26, 2005

9. RELEASE OF SOVIET-ERA DOCUMENTARY COLLECTION ON
UKRAINIAN HOLODOMOR, FAMINE-GENOCIDE OF 1932-1933
Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Monday, November 21, 2005

10. NATIONWIDE CANDLE LIGHTING AND BELL RINGING
PROGRAM FOR USA: UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE REMEMBRANCE
Nick Mischenko, President, Ukrainian Genocide Foundation - USA
Chicago, Illinois, Monday, November 21, 2005

11. UKRAINE'S REP TO UNITED NATIONS SPEAKS AT HOLODOMOR
1932-1933 MEMORIAL SERVICE AT ST. PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL
Reads statement from Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko
STATEMENT: by H.E. Valeriy Kuchinsky, Ambassador,
Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations
St. Patrick's Cathedral, New York, New York, November 19, 2005

12. PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH: MESSAGE IN COMMEMORATION
OF THE 72ND ANNIVERSARY OF THE UKRAINIAN FAMINE
The White House, Washington, D.C., Saturday, November 19, 2005

13. UKRAINE DEMANDS 'GENOCIDE' MARKED
A quarter of Ukraine's population was wiped out in just two years
BBC NEWS, United Kingdom, Friday, November 25, 2005

14. 'THE FIGHT TO STAY ALIVE'- UKRAINIAN HOLODOMOR
EXHIBITION OPENED IN KYIV, UKRAINE
What Ukrainians were forced to eat to defy death by hunger
By E. Morgan Williams, Publisher & Editor
The Action Ukraine Report (AUR)
Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, November 26, 2005

15. PART FOUR: WHY DID STALIN EXTERMINATE THE UKRAINIANS?
Comprehending the Holodomor. The position of soviet historians
By Stanislav Kulchytsky, Ph.D. (History), Part Four
The Day Weekly Digest in English # 37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005
=========================================================
1. 33,000 CANDLES TO LIGHT UP NIGHT SKY IN KYIV IN
REMEMBRANCE OF MILLIONS OF VICTIMS OF UKRAINIAN
GENOCIDE-HOLODOMOR-DEATH BY TERROR-FAMINE

E. Morgan Williams, Publisher and Editor
The Action Ukraine Report (AUR)
Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, November 26, 2005

KYIV - Kateryna Chumachenko Yushchenko, now First Lady of
Ukraine, told me on Holodomor Remembrance Day in November of
2003 that a dream of her husband, Victor Yushchenko, now President
of Ukraine, and herself was to have the anniversary of the death of
millions in Ukraine marked by lighting 33,000 candles, representing the
number of people who died every day at the genocidal famine's height
in the spring of 1933, in the area between St. Sophia and St. Michael's
cathedrals in Ukraine.

Today the long-held dream of Kateryna and Victor Yushchenko will
finally come true. At 4 p.m. the 33,000 candles will be lit in the
squares of two of Kyiv's famous cathedrals and in the space
between.

Several thousand candles were lit in courtyard of St. Michael's
square in November of 2003. It was a very moving, impressive sight
and experience. The lighting of 33,000 candles tonight will be just
an unbelievable, very emotional, unforgettable moment.

There will the planting of a Kalyna (snowball) tree at St. Andrew's
Chapel in Kyiv on Saturday morning. Around 2 p.m. several thousand
persons, representing every oblast in Ukraine, will march from St.
Sophia Cathedral to St. Michael's Cathedral where the Holodomor
Monument is located. At the Monument will be a memorial religious
service headed by the leaders of various faiths.

At 4 p.m. President Yushchenko will declare a National Moment
of Silence and the lighting of the 33,000 candles will begin. The
President will ask all citizens of Ukraine, all the Ukrainians around
the world and friends of Ukraine to also light a candle.

A Requiem will begin at 5 p.m. at the National Shevchenko Opera.

President Yushchenko began the Holodomor remembrance
events on Friday at the opening of the largest Holodomor Memorial
Exhibition every held in Ukraine at the Ukrainian House. The President
spoke and then spent an hour looking at the various exhibits.

The rotunda of the Ukrainian House included six large banners hung
for the fourth floor balcony that included the names of Holodomor
victims, 'infamous' quotes by Stalin, and newspaper and photo
accounts of the genocidal famine in Ukraine. On the walls were over
40 panels of documents related to Soviet oppressions against
Ukraine in the 1930's.

The exhibits included a gallery of 50 Holodomor artworks by
artist Franchuk. The major portion of the exhibition was the display
of 300 paintings, posters, graphics, linocuts by Mykola Bondarenko,
photographs, folk-art, and other historical Ukrainian items from my
private collection and from the collection of the International
Ukrainian Genocide-Holodomor Committee.

We gave President Yushchenko a personal tour where he stopped
and gave personal comments on many of the items in the Exhibition.
Several times he stopped to take photographs of several of the
posters on display with his own camera.

The Holodomor Exhibition will be open every day at the
Ukrainian House through Tuesday, November 29th.

The Exhibition of items from the collection of the International
Ukrainian Genocide-Holodomor Committee and the private
collection of Morgan Williams is being sponsored by the
Dr. James Mace Holodomor Memorial Fund of the Ukrainian
Federation of America, Zenia Chernyk, Chairperson; Vera M.
Andryczyk, President; Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania; The Bleyzer
Foundation, Michael and Natasha Bleyzer and the Bleyzer Family,
Houston, Texas and Kyiv, Ukraine; Ukrainian Orthodox Church of
the USA, Archbishop Antony, South Bound Brook, New Jersey;
David Holpert, W J Grain, Kyiv; David and Tamara Sweere,
Kiev-Atlantic, Kyiv; Eugenia Dallas; Helen and Alex Woskob;
and the Bahriany Foundation, Anatol Lysyj, Chairman.

The International Ukrainian Genocide-Holodomor Committee
plans to work with Ukrainian Communities in Australia, Great
Britain, Canada and the United States to have additional
cities around the world light 33,000 candles on this special day
of remembrance in the future.

The Committee is also working to prepare an traveling exhibition that
would be presented in major Ukrainian cities and around the world
between 2006 and 2008 when the 75th anniversary of the Holodomor
will occur. The Committee also is working with several organizations
to publish a Holodomor Exhibition Catalog that will tell the story of
the Holodomor through paintings, posters, graphics and other artwork
by Ukrainian artists. -30-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
2. PRESIDENT OPENS EXHIBITION TO HONOR FAMINE VICTIMS

Press office of President Victor Yushchenko of Ukraine
Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

KYIV - Victor Yushchenko took part in a ceremony to open an exhibition
dedicated to genocide famines and political repressions in Ukraine.

Opening the exhibition, The Swaying Bells of Memory, the Head of State
stressed that these genocide famines were Ukraine's greatest national
tragedy, killing more people than during World War II. He noted that there
were still many mysteries and unknown facts about those events that should
be meticulously studied.

Yushchenko emphasized that the whole world should remember this tragedy to
never let it happen again. He said we should construct a monument that would
be adequate to the unprecedented scale of this disaster. The President is
convinced it is necessary to conduct a contest to choose the best design of
this monument, and believes we should also establish a national institute of
memory.

"I would like to address the Culture Minister, cabinet members and
parliamentarians: we must pay our tribute to all victims of this tragedy,"
he said. "This is the challenge our generation is faced with."

Yushchenko gratefully recollected all people who had begun to openly speak
about the genocide famine many years ago. He particularly thanked Vasyl
Barka, writer who first used this word combination in his book The Yellow
Knight, and the poet Borys Oliynyk.

He also reiterated that parliaments of the United States, Australia, Canada,
Hungary, Argentina, Lithuania and Ukraine had acknowledged those famines
as genocide against the Ukrainian people.

The Head of State urged the world community to acknowledge it. "I would like
to ask Ukraine's political and public organizations to more actively work in
this field. We should receive the world acknowledgement of this tragedy. The
world must know about it," he said.

Yushchenko added that we should make a documentary to "detail this tragic
page of our history."

In 2003, he said, the UN also acknowledged our famine as genocide in its
declaration, which was signed by 63 countries. The Head of State said he
wanted our diplomats to more actively work with UN members to raise their
awareness of the tragedy.

The President also thanked the Vasyl Stus Memorial Association for their
initiative to construct a memorial complex and a museum commemorating all
victims of those events.

Yushchenko stressed that on November 26 he wanted "the Ukrainian nation to
spare no effort to make this day relevant to this profound tragedy," and
said those events had affected all regions of Ukraine. The President called
on each citizen to honor the millions of famine victims.

Speaking about tomorrow's plans, he reminded all they would plant a snowball
garden. "I want all of you to join us and I would like to see more kids,
young people and students there," he stressed.

Yushchenko noted that it would be sad if only cabinet members and
politicians took part in this ceremony. He also asked all Ukrainian drivers
to stop their cars tomorrow at 4 PM to silently honor the victims and then
urged Ukrainians to light candles at this time.

The President thanked coordinators of the exhibition, which he visited along
with First Deputy Secretariat Chief of Staff Ivan Vasyunyk, Humanitarian
Vice Prime Minister Vyacheslav Kyrylenko, Foreign Minister Borys Tarasyuk,
and Culture Minister Ihor Likhovy.

Visitors can see photos, documents and books dedicated to the famines and
political repressions. The opening ceremony was accompanied with symphonic
music and choir singing. -30-

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
3. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT YUSHCHENKO CALLS ON WORLD
TO RECOGNIZE SOVIET-ERA FAMINE AS GENOCIDE

Associated Press (AP), Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

KYIV, Ukraine - President Viktor Yushchenko called on the international
community Friday to recognize as genocide the forced Soviet-era famine
that killed up to 10 million Ukrainians.

Soviet dictator Josef Stalin provoked the 1932-1933 famine as part of his
campaign to force Ukrainian peasants to give up their land and join
collective farms. During the height of the famine, cases of cannibalism
were widespread as people grew desperate to survive.

"The world must know about this tragedy," said Yushchenko at the
opening of an exhibition dedicated to the famine victims on the eve of its
anniversary. He said the millions of victims should "become a lesson for
our nation as well as for the whole world."

Yushchenko demanded that Ukrainian diplomats strengthen their efforts
to receive recognition from all countries. Already, some countries such
as Canada, the United States, Austria, Hungary and Lithuania have
recognized the famine as genocide.

Ukraine plans to mark the anniversary Saturday by lighting 33,000
candles - representing the number of people who died every day at the
famine's height.

The former Soviet republic also plans to plant an alley of trees and hold a
downtown march in the capital, Kyiv. The National Broadcasting Council
asked television and radio stations to not air any entertainment programs
on Saturday. -30-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
4. 'PEOPLE WERE EATING PEOPLE'
Survivors recall 1932-1933 famine in Ukraine with horror and tears

By Nick Martin, The Winnipeg Free Press
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Monday, November 21, 2005

WINNIPEG - VALENTYNA Strazewski quietly sobbed yesterday as she
remembered her starving mother's refusal to eat the sweet-smelling oil for
which she'd traded family heirlooms -- her mother believed she had been
tricked and the oil was really human fat. Strazewski was seven years old.

"People were eating people" during the famine which Ukrainians believe
Soviet leader Josef Stalin deliberately unleashed on the people of Ukraine
in 1932 and 1933 in a planned genocide, Strazewski said.

When her grandfather died, the family left him at the gate of the
churchyard, never knowing what became of him, she said, covering her
eyes with a handkerchief.

Families gather at St. Mary the Protectress Cathedral on Burrows Avenue
every year to remember the seven million victims of that famine, which they
believe was a deliberate attempt to destroy Ukrainian peasantry.

There are about 35 famine survivors in Winnipeg, most preteens at the time,
now in their 80s, said congregation member Val Noseworthy.

The church is campaigning to have the Ukrainian famine included in the
human rights museum now being planned at The Forks.

"I was seven years old," Strazewski said. "My mother died of starvation."

Before she got sick, her mother had hacked away the ice from a nearby river
and found a few mussels. She also sold jewels for small amounts of grain.
Once, her barter included the suspicious oil. When spring came, the family
ate grass boiled like spinach.

"In 1932, they confiscate everything," Strazewski said. "They threw us out
from where we were living.

The system, they were making collective farms. "The young communists
came and confiscated everything and left us with nothing. They took the
beans we have, they took the beets."

Her father was forced to work in a locomotive factory, and only came
home once or twice a week with a portion of his rations. "He was afraid
someone would kill him and eat him" if he left the factory too often, said
Strazewski.

Her grandmother starved to death right in front of her, she recalled with
tears.

Halina Matwijiw said she was only able to survive because her father worked
in a city cafeteria open to people not targeted for famine. "We have seven
children in family. My mama was sick -- 1933, she died."

Her father's sister "came from the village and said, half of the village is
dead because no food. She told us, no cats, no dogs in village, everything
eaten. People started eating grass."

Matwijiw would reach the cafeteria through the huge train station. "Inside
the station, on benches, lay down people. I saw hands and legs so small they
couldn't even move. People can't work, so small are their hands," she said.

"We want it to never happen to anyone else," Noseworthy said.

"For the 70th anniversary, we thought it would be important to record their
living testament," Noseworthy said. "Until that point, they wouldn't talk to
anyone. They were afraid of reprisals" against family still in Ukraine.

"We have video footage, where they've been interviewed." -30-
(nick.martin@freepress.mb.ca)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
5. LITHUANIAN SEJM RECOGNIZES FAMINE OF 1932-1933
IN UKRAINE AS GENOCIDE

Interfax-Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

KYIV - The Lithuanian Sejm or parliament has recognized the famine of
1932-1933 in Ukraine as an act of genocide, the Liberty Radio reported
on Friday.

Soviet leader Josef Stalin's totalitarian communist regime committed a
deliberate act of genocide against the Ukrainian people, the Sejm declared.
The parliament expressed sympathy with Ukrainians and solidarity with
Ukrainian people.

Stalin unleashed famine on Ukraine, the lower Volga and northern
Caucuses in 1932 to break the will of peasant farmers and force through
the collectivization of farms.

By raising Soviet central government grain procurement quotas, he left
farmers without grain stocks for themselves, while ordering the execution or
deportation of those who attempted to retain any grain, even seed grain, for
themselves.

The resulting famine cost the lives of between six and seven million
Ukrainians, according to some estimates. -30-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in a letter-to-the-editor today. Let us hear from you.
========================================================
6. UKRAINIAN DIASPORA IN RUSSIA TO MARK DAY OF
MEMORY OF FAMINE AND POLITICAL REPRESSION VICTIMS
ON NOVEMBER 26

Tatyana Gordiyenko, Ukrinform, Kyiv, Ukraine, Fri, Nov 25, 2005

MOSCOW, RUSSIA - On the day of memory of famine and political
repression victims, which is marked since 1998, representatives of the
Ukrainian Diaspora of Russia will meet in Moscow and in regions on
November 26.

The Ukrainians who reside beyond Ukraine will commemorate the victims
with lighting candles in Russian temples. The commemoration events will
include documentary video presentation, monography presentation and
other events.

Day of memory of famine and political repression victims is annually
marked on November's fourth Saturday.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
7. DAY OF FAMINE VICTIMS MARKED IN BELARUS

Ukrinform, Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, November 25, 2005

MINSK, BELARUS - Under the presidential decree the Ukrainian
Embassy in Belarus are holding a series of events on the occasion
of Day of memory of famine and political repression victims in
Ukraine.

To this end the Ukrainian Embassy in Belarus has disseminated a
press release "Genocide - Termless Crime". The diplomats held
meetings with different public figures.

On November 26 public prayers will be held with participation of the
Ukrainian Diaspora representatives and diplomats, other mourning
events will be staged, too. -30-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
8. UKRAINIAN AUSTRALIANS CALL FOR CITIZENS TO LIGHT A
CANDLE ON SUN, NOV 27 TO COMMEMORATE THE MILLIONS
WHO PERISHED IN THE GREAT UKRAINIAN FAMINE
(HOLODOMOR), AN ACT OF GENOCIDE IN 1932-1933.

Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organizations
Representing 24 Peak Ukrainian Organizations in Australia
Member of Ukrainian World Congress
Australia, Saturday, November 26, 2005

Australia - ALENTYNA Strazewski quietly sobbed as she remembered
her starving mother's refusal to eat the sweet-smelling oil for which she'd
traded family heirlooms -- her mother believed she had been tricked and
the oil was really human fat. Strazewski was seven years old.

"People were eating people" during the famine which Ukrainians believe
Soviet leader Josef Stalin deliberately unleashed on the people of Ukraine
in 1932 and 1933 in a planned genocide, Strazewski said The Winnipeg
Free Press, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, Monday, November 21, 2005

Like Strazewski, there are survivors living in Australia with similar
horrific memories.

Australians are encouraged to light a candle tomorrow Sunday November 27,
2005 to commemorate the many millions of people who perished in the Great
Ukrainian Famine (Holodomor) in 1932/33.

The victims will be remembered in memorial services throughout the world as
Ukrainians commemorate this atrocity against the Ukrainian nation. Ukrainian
churches throughout Australia will hold requiem services and candle lighting
ceremonies.

In Melbourne services will be held at the Ukrainian Catholic Cathedral
Canning St North Melbourne (10.30am) and Ukrainian Orthodox Church
Buckley St Essendon (11.00am) and the candle lighting vigil at 1.30pm at the
Ukrainian Community Centre in Russell St. Essendon.

“This act of Genocide must never be forgotten.” Mr. Stefan Romaniw OAM
Chairman of the Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organizations (AFUO)
said today

“To this day the international courts have not investigated nor tried one of
the greatest atrocities against mankind.” Mr. Romaniw said. “Children,
women and men perished from a planned program of killing off a nation.”
Mr. Romaniw said.

The AFUO as part of an international campaign and the International
Ukrainian Genocide-Holodomor Committee has called on President
Victor Yushchenko to pursue this matter through international channels.

“This is not just another issue for Ukrainians. This is an international
issue .Stalin and his Communist regime set out to eradicate a nation – and
no one seems to really care and want to ask the hard questions “Mr.
Romaniw said

“Who will stand up for those who were forcibly starved to death? Who
will speak for them?” These issues must be pursued to ensure they are
never allowed to happen again” Mr. Romaniw said

In Ukraine, President Yuschenko is examining proposals for the building of
a national memorial centre, including international study centre and museum.
The AFUO is part of an international group pressing for this to be realized.

Light a candle, recall this terrible part of history and act against mankind
and pray that it is never repeated. -30-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information contact: Stefan Romaniw 0419531255;
sromaniw@bigpond.net.au.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
9. RELEASE OF SOVIET-ERA DOCUMENTARY COLLECTION ON
UKRAINIAN HOLODOMOR, FAMINE-GENOCIDE OF 1932-1933

Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Monday, November 21, 2005

CALGARY, Canada - To mark Ukraine's annual day of remembrance for
the many millions of victims of the genocidal Great Famine in Soviet
Ukraine, known as the Holodomor, which this year falls on 26 November,
the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association has published The famine-
genocide of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Kashtan Press, 2005, 336 pp, ISBN#
1-896354-38-6, $35) prepared by a Kyiv historian, Professor Yuri Shapoval.

Consisting of 81 Soviet-era documents, in Russian and Ukrainian, dealing
with the causes and consequences of this famine, the book also contains
English-language annotations of each document, a list of acronyms, and an
introduction in English and Ukrainian by Dr Shapoval.

Funding for this project was made available by the Ukrainian Canadian
Professional and Business Association in Calgary, with the assistance of
UCCLA, the Ukrainian American Civil Liberties Association, the Australian
Federation of Ukrainian Organizations, and the Association of Ukrainians in
Great Britain.

Commenting on the release of this collection, UCCLA's director of special
projects, Borys Sydoruk, said: " One of the most important mandates of
UCCLA is to ensure that educational materials about issues in Ukrainian
history are readily available to scholars, the media, and students.

With this publication we are providing primary source material about the
Holodomor to a very large audience by distributing complementary copies
to university and public libraries across Canada and worldwide.

Anyone interested in knowing more about this Soviet crime against humanity
can already find the book in repositories from Washington to Jerusalem to
London to Moscow. We are grateful to those of our partner organizations in
the Diaspora who saw the need for this book which will further focus
attention on what was arguably the greatest episode of mass murder in 20th
century European history."

While most copies of the book are being distributed to libraries and
research institutes, a limited number are available for sale to the general
public (The Kashtan Press, 22 Gretna Green, Kingston, Ontario, Canada,
K7M 3J2, for $35, which includes postage and handling). For more on
UCCLA go to www.uccla.ca.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
10. NATIONWIDE CANDLE LIGHTING AND BELL RINGING
PROGRAM FOR USA: UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE REMEMBRANCE

Nick Mischenko, President, Ukrainian Genocide Foundation - USA
Chicago, Illinois, Monday, November 21, 2005

To: Reverend Clergy of all Ukrainian Churches in the USA

Dear Pastors,

The Ukrainian Genocide Foundation-USA is coordinating a nationwide
candle lighting and church bell ringing program in the United States in
conjunction with the Ukrainian Genocide Remembrance in Ukraine and
the International Ukrainian Genocide-Holodomor Committee.

We encourage the participation of your parish in this effort to keep the
memory of the victims of the genocide, which took place in 1932-1933 in
Ukraine alive.

In Ukraine, this event is scheduled for Saturday, November 26, 2005 starting
with memorial services and lighting of 33,000 candles at St. Sophia's square
in Kyiv with a simultaneous ringing of the bells in all churches across
Ukraine. At the height of the Ukrainian Genocide 33,000 people starved to
death each day.

Here in the United States, we ask that your church light 33 symbolic candles
and perform memorial service on Sunday, November 27, 2005. We ask that
you take a few moments to ring your church bells at 12:00 noon local time as
a sign of mourning.

As Ukrainian-Americans we will unite on November 27th and proclaim to the
world that: "We will never forget the over 10,000,000 victims of the
Ukrainian Genocide" -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
11. UKRAINE'S REP TO UNITED NATIONS SPEAKS AT HOLODOMOR
1932-1933 MEMORIAL SERVICE AT ST. PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL
Reads statement from Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko

STATEMENT: by H.E. Valeriy Kuchinsky, Ambassador,
Permanent Representative of Ukraine to the United Nations
St. Patrick's Cathedral
New York, New York, November 19, 2005

Your eminencies,
Reverend fathers,
Ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great honour and a privilege for me to address this distinguished
audience.

It has become a valuable tradition that every November the St. Patrick's
Cathedral welcomes those who feel deep sorrow for the tragedy of Holodomor,
generations have come and gone, but the horrors of 1932-1933 remain in the
hearts of the survivors and their descendants.

The whole truth about Holodomor is not yet fully known to the world. We
strongly believe that the international community must give that crime its
proper name - genocide, which was planned and executed to destroy Ukrainian
people.

The Ukrainian authorities take every opportunity to remind the international
community of Holodomor.

Addressing the 2005 World Summit in September here in New York, the
President of Ukraine Victor Yushchenko told the leaders of over 150
countries: and I quote "I am appealing to you on behalf of the nation that
has lost ten million of human lives because of the famine - genocide
arranged against our nation. At that time the governments of all counties
turned their back to our grief. We insist that the world should come to know
the truth about all the crimes against humanity. That is how we can be sure
that the indifference will never encourage the criminals." end of quote.

In his address to the 60th session of the UN General Assembly a few of days
later the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Borys Tarasyuk once again
drew attention to the tragedy of our nation.

Seizing the opportunity of the Holocaust remembrance at the UN General
Assembly earlier this month, I underlined in my statement that Holodomor as
well as the Holocaust continues to belong to those national tragedies, which
still await wider international recognition, I called on the representatives
of States to recognize this crime against humanity as an act of genocide
against the Ukrainian nation.

Two years ago a Joint Statement on the 70th anniversary of Holodomor,
supported by over 60 delegations - one third of UN membership - was issued
as an official document of the General Assembly.

In this declaration, for the first time in the history of the United
Nations, Holodomor has been officially recognized as the national tragedy of
Ukrainian people caused by the cruel actions and policies of the
totalitarian regime. Representatives from different parts of the world
expressed their sympathy to the victims of Holodomor and deplored the acts
and policies that brought about mass starvation and death of millions of
people.

The House of Representatives of the U.S. Congress has adopted a resolution
that allows Ukrainian officials to establish a memorial in Washington to
honor the victims of the Ukrainian famine-genocide of 1932-1933.

Ukraine will continue to do its utmost to bring the truth about Holodomor to
the world at large.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, let me read out the message from the
President of Ukraine Victor Yushchenko on the occasion of the holding of
today's Memorial Service.

THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE

To the participants of the ceremony
to honor the victims of Holodomor, 1932-33
New York, 19 November, 2005

I am wholeheartedly grateful to the participants of the ceremony to honor
the victims of Holodomor of 1932-33 for their concern and sympathy that
unite us in this time of sorrow.

Today we are bowing our heads before the deep tragedy of a loss of loved
ones, remembering both the tyranny of the totalitarian system and the
historic lie of concealing the crimes against humankind and humanity.

The Ukrainian people survived this ordeal by the too high price of millions
of lives.

I would like to express my special words of gratitude to the American
nation, which was the first to recognize the terrible consequences of
Holodomor of 1932-33. I hope that this tragedy of a European scale will be
recognized also by the whole international community. Truth and remembrance
are needed to make sure that the horrors of the past will not be repeated in
the future.

In Ukraine, honoring the fallen and supporting those affected by Holodomors,
as well as study of hidden for decades pages of the Ukrainian history, are
matters of high priority for the state policy. We are in the process of
establishing the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, building new
memorials and restoring burial sites.

Soon, there will be a Guelder rose park on the hilly banks of Dnipro - river
to pay tribute to every village that had suffered the effects of Holodomor.

I believe that the words of common prayer in memory of the victims of
Holodomor that will resound in many places around the world will bring peace
and solace to the souls of the innocently perished will unite us in the
common strive to build a just world with its highest value of a human life.

Victor Yushchenko -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
220 East 51 Street New York, N.Y. 10022
Tel: (212) 759 70 03 · Fax: (212) 355 94 55 ·
E-mail: uno_us@mfa.gov.ua · http://www.un.int/ukraine

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
12. PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH: MESSAGE IN COMMEMORATION
OF THE 72ND ANNIVERSARY OF THE UKRAINIAN FAMINE

The White House
Washington, D.C., Saturday, November 19, 2005

I send greetings to those gathered to commemorate the 72nd anniversary
of the Ukrainian Famine. I join my fellow Americans in expressing deepest
condolences on this solemn occasion.

Millions in Ukraine were oppressed by Joseph Stalin's totalitarian regime
and suffered through devastating famine from 1932 to 1933. They showed
great courage and strength throughout this atrocity, and the world will
always remember those who gave their lives to resist evil. We must strive
to prevent similar acts of cruelty from ever happening again.

The desire for justice, freedom, human rights, and accountable,
representative government is universal. Since Ukraine's independence in
1991, the Ukrainian people have demonstrated a firm commitment to
freedom for all people, and last year's Orange Revolution was a powerful
example of democracy in action.

In President Viktor Yushchenko, the Ukrainian people have a courageous
leader, and America is proud to call Ukraine a friend.

Laura and I send our best wishes on this solemn occasion.

George W. Bush -30-

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in a letter-to-the-editor today. Let us hear from you.
========================================================
13. UKRAINE DEMANDS 'GENOCIDE' MARKED
A quarter of Ukraine's population was wiped out in just two years

BBC NEWS, UK, Friday, November 25, 2005

KIEV - Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko has called on the
international community to recognise the 1930s Great Famine as Soviet-
enforced genocide.

"The world must know about this tragedy," he said, at the opening of an
exhibition dedicated to famine victims.

Millions of Ukrainians starved to death in 1932-33 as USSR leader Joseph
Stalin stripped them of their produce in a forced farm collectivisation
campaign.

A small number of nations have already recognised the famine as genocide.

Ukraine has designated 26 November as an official day of remembrance for
victims of "Holodomor" - meaning murder by hunger - and other political
crackdowns.

There are plans to mark the anniversary this Saturday by lighting 33,000
candles - representing the number of people thought to have been dying
every day at the height of the famine.

The true scale of the disaster was concealed by the Soviet Union, and only
came to light after Ukrainian independence in 1991. Cannibalism is reported
to have become rife as a whole nation starved.

The tragedy should "become a lesson for our nation as well as for the
whole world", Mr Yushchenko said on Friday.

In 2003, marking the 70th anniversary of the famine, UN Under Secretary
General for Communications and Publication Shashi Tharoor said it "ranks
with the worst atrocities of our time".

Nevertheless, a UN declaration - while recognising the famine as Ukraine's
national tragedy - did not include the word "genocide" - to the great dismay
of Ukraine which lobbied hard for the inclusion of the term.

RUSSIA OPPOSED

Roman Serbyn, professor of history and a Ukrainian expert at the University
of Quebec in Montreal, says: "Ukraine did not make a technically clear
case."

He believes the "genocide" designation has proved elusive because the famine
is often considered to have been aimed at a social group (peasants) rather
than a national or ethnic group.

However, a strong case can be put showing that by closing the borders so
Ukrainians could not escape to Russia, Stalin was targeting Ukrainian
nationals, he says.

Russia opposes designation as genocide, he says, and "the biggest reason is
national pride. But also the political and economic consequences... if you
recognise a crime you might have to pay compensation".

In 2003 Russia's ambassador to Ukraine, Viktor Chernomyrdin, was quoted by
Interfax news agency dismissing talk of an apology or compensation, saying:
"We're not going to apologise... there is nobody to apologise to."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4471256.stm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOOTNOTES FROM BBC: GREAT FAMINE
Called Holodomor in Ukrainian - meaning murder by hunger
About a quarter of Ukraine's population wiped out
Seven to 10 million people thought to have died
Children disappeared; cannibalism became widespread

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
14. 'THE FIGHT TO STAY ALIVE'- UKRAINIAN HOLODOMOR
EXHIBITION OPENED IN KYIV, UKRAINE
What Ukrainians were forced to eat to defy death by hunger

By E. Morgan Williams, Publisher & Editor
The Action Ukraine Report (AUR)
Kyiv, Ukraine, Saturday, November 26, 2005

KYIV - On Friday, November 25, the President of Ukraine opened an
exhibition at the Ukrainian House in Kyiv about the Ukrainian Genocide -
the Holodomor- Famine-Terror Death for Millions, of 1932-1933 imposed
on the Ukrainian nation by the Soviet government of Josef Stalin.

Part of the largest Holodomor exhibition ever held in Ukraine featured a
series of 65 graphics, linocuts, by Mykola Mykhaylovych Bondarenko,
Ukrainian graphic artist from the village of Dmytrivka in the Sumy Oblast.

The President of Ukraine, Victor Yushchenko, was shown this
Exhibition personally by Ukrainian artist Myhkola Bondarenko.

The artworks answer the question as to what people, when their entire
normal supply of food was stolen away by the Soviets were forced to
eat in their frantic attempt to defy death by hunger. This will be the
first exhibition of these artworks in Ukraine. Mr. Bondarenko, born in
1949, will be present at the Holodomor Exhibition.

Oleksander Kapitonenko, Simferopol, in a preface to a book about
the Bondarenko graphics, published by the Ukrainian Orthodox Church
of the USA wrote: "From early childhood, Mykola Mykhaylovych
(Bondarenko) loved to listed to the old people reminiscing about village
life in the olden days.

Having learned about the famine, he attempted to reproduce it graphically,
but was not satisfied with the few sketches he made. The artist wished to
tell about this tragedy in his own, different way.

He considered the fact, that although entire families and entire villages
were annihilated by the famine, some individuals managed to survive.
What was it that helped them defy death by hunger?

He went around [for five years from 1988-1993] questioning the old-
timers [famine survivors in his district] who told him about their
unbelievable "menu".

Thus he found the answer to his question; he decided to portray not
the emaciated [dying] peasants, but rather the "food" which they were
forced to ingest in order to [attempt] to survive.

At first he tried to paint several of the more common weeds which
were consumed by the starving people, raw or prepared. Then he
turned to producing a series of graphical depictions of other
vegetation.

His sketchbooks contain drawings from nature of coughgrass, clover,
hemp, sweet-flag, burdock, rush (cane), nettle, thistles, lime tree and
acacia buds, from which engravings have been made.

Almost each engraving depicts a window, the cross-like frame of which
symbolizes the heavy cross, carried by those condemned to death.
Every windowpane symbolized the hope to survive the famine.

On such a background are depicted weeds and some other plants
consumed by the starving people during those horrible times. On
the right windowpane is the "recipe" for preparing this ersatz food.

Several of the engravings show the self-made tools, which helped
the peasants to chop, grind, sieve, squeeze, and other prepare the
weeds [most of them not really digestible in natural form]. To own
such tools meant risking one's life.

The most touching and alarming for the viewer are the depictions
of domestic animals - a cat, or a dog, fleeing to who knows where,
so that they would not be caught and eaten; carcasses of dead cows
or horses, which the starved populace did not hesitate to eat, and the
panicked eyes of fledgling birds in a nest, which is about to be robbed
by the hand of a starving person.

Noticeable is these engravings is the absense of any accusations of
those who wrote the scenario of the famine, and of those who only
too eagerly helped in this criminal action.

Only the sickles and hammers on the iron rods with which the
village activists [many sent to Ukraine by Stalin for this purpose]
probed everywhere in, looking for hidden food of the peasants,
point to the cause of the famine. [There are also two very small
red stars near the bottom of each side of every graphic which gives
another clue as to the perpetrators of the genocide against the
Ukrainian people.]

And, also, the blood on the knife blade [found in one of the graphics]
reminds the viewer that we are dealing with a horrible crime." [by
Oleksander Kapitonenko, Simferopol in 2003]

The Exhibition of the artworks by Bondarenko is being sponsored by
the Dr. James Mace Holodomor Memorial Fund of the Ukrainian
Federation of America, Zenia Chernyk, Chairperson; Vera M.
Andryczyk, President; Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania; The Bleyzer
Foundation, Michael and Natasha Bleyzer and the Bleyzer Family,
Houston, Texas and Kyiv, Ukraine; Ukrainian Orthodox Church of
the USA, Archbishop Antony, South Bound Brook, New Jersey;
David Holpert, W J Grain, Kyiv; David and Tamara Sweere,
Kiev-Atlantic, Kyiv; Eugenia Dallas; Helen and Alex Woskob;
and the Bahriany Foundation, Anatol Lysyj, Chairman.

The Bondarenko Exhibition was arranged by Morgan Williams,
SigmaBleyzer, on behalf of the International Ukrainian Genocide-
Holodomor Committee and designed by Volodymyr and Irina
Veshtak, expert graphic artists, Kyiv, Ukraine.

The exhibition at the Ukrainian House features several hundred
other works about the Holodomor including paintings, posters,
photos, documents, and other graphic material. The Exhibition
will be open through Tuesday, November 30. -30-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOOTNOTE: A book showing the Bondarenko artworks, "Ukraine
1933; A Cookbook, Linocuts by Myklola Bondarenko" published by
the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the USA, South Bound Brook,
New Jersey in 2003, in remembrance of the millions of Ukrainians
who perished during the Great Famine of Ukraine in 1932-1933 is
still available. For information about how to purchase the book please
send an e-mail to ArtUkraine.com@starpower.net.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
15. PART FOUR: WHY DID STALIN EXTERMINATE THE UKRAINIANS?
Comprehending the Holodomor. The position of soviet historians

By Stanislav Kulchytsky, Ph.D. (History), Part Four
The Day Weekly Digest in English # 37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

PART FOUR:

A CONFLICT WITHIN A GENERATION

I have already mentioned that both right- and left-leaning unscrupulous
politicians tend to politicize the subject of the Holodomor. In doing so,
they aim to please their voters, which is quite natural for politicians. Why
has it become possible to capitalize on the subject of the famine?

Why do our fellow countrymen have differing opinions of the Holodomor?
Finding the answer requires the use of a more or less abstract notion - a
generation.

In the past I used to think that another abstract notion, territory, was
more suitable for such analysis. So much has been said about the division
of Ukraine into eastern and western halves, as well as about the special
mentality of the population in the western oblasts, which came under Russia
in the form of the Soviet Union (or reunited with the Ukrainian SSR, which
is also true) only in 1939-1940.

Now I consider that the decisive role in shaping the difference between the
eastern and western oblasts of present-day sovereign Ukraine was played by
the presence or absence of mass repressions when a particular generation
was forming.

The Kremlin used mass repressions while building the "commune state" in
1918-1938, and during the Stalinist Sovietization of Ukraine's western
oblasts in 1939-1952. Notably in the latter case, the repressions affected a
different generation. This means that the representatives of Ukraine's
oldest living generation in the western and eastern oblasts have had
different life experiences, which is why they feel differently about
history.

The residents of the western oblasts hate communism with a passion and
despise the Communist Party and Soviet nomenklatura that carried out
repressions during the "first Soviets," i.e., from 1939, and during the
"second Soviets," i.e., from 1944.

Meanwhile, the residents of the eastern oblasts were raised under the Soviet
system. Unlike their parents, they were loyal to the government and were
therefore spared Stalinist repressions. Even though mass repressions in the
USSR continued until Stalin's death, they became selective, targeting
individual territories (the Baltic republics, the western Ukrainian oblasts)
or nationalities (e.g., the campaign to combat cosmopolitanism, "the
Doctors' Case").

Manipulating the enslaved population, Stalin used the human and material
resources of Ukraine's eastern oblasts to combat the anti-Soviet
underground movement in western Ukraine.

The anticommunism of the population in the western oblasts is manifested
always and in everything. The West and the Ukrainian Diaspora, whose
representatives mostly have Galician roots, proved very responsive to the
tragedy of the Holodomor, even though they were not directly affected by it.
The well-organized North American Diaspora made a decisive contribution
to exposing the Kremlin's most horrible crime.

For the anticommunist-minded representatives of the older generation in the
western oblasts, the 1932-1933 famine was a priori a crime committed by
the Kremlin. They needed no documents and accepted the testimonies of
Holodomor witnesses as true. It turned out that they were right to do so.

On the contrary, this generation's representatives in the east have embarked
(at least one would hope so) on a long and painful road of de-Stalinization,
consciously giving up the stereotypes of thinking and behavior, which the
Soviet system had inculcated in them since childhood.

World War II veterans and Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) veterans find it
very hard to come to terms not because they fought on opposing sides. Other
wartime enemies in Europe have long since made peace. Our veterans have
had different life experiences, and it is hard for them to give up the
beliefs of their youth.

Perhaps the real picture of the Holodomor will facilitate this painful
reassessment of values. I must admit that the realization that you have
become what you are as a result of government manipulations is an unpleasant
thing. Yet it is much more unpleasant to remain that way until your final
hour. How can one be Stalin's puppet half a century after his death?

My own reassessment of values took place under the influence of my study of
Holodomor history. In 1981 I published a book entitled Partiia Lenina - Sila
Narodnaia [Lenin's Party - the People's Strength], which was designed for
Soviet schoolchildren. I was being honest with them because I believed in
what I was writing. I believed not only because I was raised in this faith.
Built by forceful means, the Leninist "commune state" became harmonious
in its own peculiar way, when there was no longer any need to use force.

Then the eternal values propagated by the Soviet government came to the
fore. Of course, I saw the double standards, but played them down as
imperfections of human nature. I felt the lack of freedom, but justified it
by the need to survive while being "surrounded by capitalists." Indeed, what
can a bird born in a cage tell you about the sky?

After several years of exploring the Holodomor, I realized that the Soviet
government was capable of exterminating people - millions of people. What
could one's attitude be to such a government and its ideals after realizing
what the Holodomor really was?

In 1991 two younger colleagues and I published the book Stalinism in
Ukraine. The title itself is proof that I was clinging to the term
"Stalinism," which is still popular in the West, and did so in an attempt to
save the idea of social equality by blaming everything on Stalin.

Later I realized that the millions of lost lives were the result of the
implementation of Lenin's idea of the "commune state". If personalized, the
communist idea should be called Leninism. In its party dimension it should
be called Bolshevism.

Tsina Velykoho Perelomu [The Price of the Great Turning Point] is the title
of my second book that was published in 1991. The title is derived from
Nikita Khrushchev's thoughts on the cost of collectivization in the lives of
Soviet citizens. At the time these thoughts astonished me because they came
from a CPSU leader.

The book's 432 pages contain hundreds of documents that paint a vivid
picture of the Holodomor. Did this book influence the people of my
generation, who need to reassess their values?

I doubt it. The state plays a key role in society's comprehension of the
real nature of the Holodomor. Through its specialized agencies the state
must bring to citizens' attention knowledge about the not so distant past,
knowledge accumulated by scholars.

In doing so, the state can prevent interpersonal conflicts stemming from
differing life experiences. The Ukrainian president's calls for
reconciliation are futile without daily educational efforts by the
government.

After 1987 the Ukrainian Communist Party and Soviet nomenklatura
approached the research and educational work on the subject of the famine
with affected enthusiasm. In September 1990 I was made a member of the
ideological commission of the CC CPU, even though I never held any posts
in the state machinery.

After the Ukrainian parliament proclaimed Ukraine's independence,
information on the Holodomor was used by the "sovereign communists"
headed by Leonid Kravchuk to convince voters that this [independence]
was the right decision.

James Mace recalled that Oles Yanchuk's film Holod-33 [Famine '33] on
which he was a consultant, did not receive a single kopeck in state
funding during the filming, but it was still aired on television before the
Dec. 1, 1991 referendum.

The first presidents of Ukraine mostly went no further than symbolic
gestures (a memorial plaque on Kyiv's St. Michael's Square and the Day to
Commemorate Holodomor Victims on the fourth Saturday of November).
Most of the books on the Holodomor have been published with donations
from sponsors, not with government funds.

In a decade and a half the leaders of Ukraine have not shown the will or
desire to republish the three volumes of witness testimonies that speak of
the tragic events in the Ukrainian countryside after 1928, which were
compiled by the Mace commission.

These three volumes contain the voices of the generation born before 1920.
What makes it unique is the fact that representatives of the first
generation of Soviet people are no longer among us.

Whereas government bodies had no pressing desire to become involved in
the subject of the Holodomor, opposition forces took over this function.
We must recognize that they did a great deal of good. At the same time this
subject became politicized. After the Orange Revolution, which removed the
old nomenklatura from power, individual former oppositionists decided that
now they could do as they pleased.

They started with a "small thing" - an attempt to move the Day to
Commemorate the Holodomor Victims, which Leonid Kuchma introduced
in 1998, from fall to springtime, so that it would not conflict with the
anniversary of the Orange Revolution. The moral myopia of such people is
astounding.

DISCUSSIONS WITH RUSSIAN SCHOLARS

The attitude of the Russian public and government to the events of 1932-1933
is another important issue. Even if we substantiate with facts that the
1932-1933 famine in Ukraine was an act of genocide, we will have to face a
different interpretation of our common past at the international level.

Discussions with Russian scholars should be conducted as openly as possible
so that we can prove the validity of our position to both the opposing side
and our own public. This is necessary in view of how Ukrainian citizens
presently understand the Holodomor.

Many our fellow countrymen believe that the causes of the 1932-1933 famine
are unclear. Others think that the famine was caused by droughts and/or
grain procurements. These were precisely the causes of the 1946- 1947
famine, which people still remember.

Most of those who think that the Holodomor was an act of genocide have a
shallow understanding of the political and legal essence of "genocide." They
are certain that if the government's actions cause mass deaths among the
population, they are always an act of genocide. The Kazakh tragedy refutes
this supposition.

Communist Party officials' ignorant attempts to force the Kazakh nomads to
settle down resulted in famine, the scale of which exceeded the Ukrainian
Holodomor if you compare the percentage of the affected population in the
two ethnic groups. However, the Kazakh tragedy was not a result of terror
by famine.

The 1932-1933 famine in Ukraine should be analyzed within the context of
the political and legal substance of the term "genocide." During a
relatively short period Stalin purposefully exterminated the village
population in two Soviet political- administrative divisions in which
Ukrainians were the dominant population (the Ukrainian SSR and the Kuban
province of the Northern Caucasus Territory of the Russian Soviet Federated
Socialist Republic).

From the very outset I would like to dissociate myself from those of my
colleagues who define the purpose of this act of genocide differently:
Stalin exterminated the Ukrainians! Of course, the end result was just that:
Stalin exterminated the Ukrainians. Yet we will not be able to prove the
validity of a claim about it being an act of genocide if we use this
simplified and purely emotional formulation.

For many years I have been conferring with a small community of scholars in
Russia and the West, who are studying the Ukrainian Holodomor, and I know
their way of thinking. For this reason I have to offer a thought-out and
clear position on the subject of genocide.

I understood the socioeconomic causes of the 1932-1933 famine already in
the early 1990s. Later, at the Department of Interwar History at the
Institute of Ukrainian History we studied the totalitarianism of the
Communist
Party and the Soviets as a holistic political and economic system, which
included a study of the Kremlin's nationality policy. Now we have arguments
relating to the national component of the Kremlin's policy.

All of the comments provided here are necessary so that my account of
discussions with Russian scholars on the nature of the 1932-1933 famine in
the Soviet Union will strike the appropriate tone.

These discussions were touched off by the May 1993 informational and
analytical conference organized by the Ukrainian Embassy in Moscow, which
was entitled "The Holodomor of 1932-1933: Tragedy and Warning." Both
sides were represented by scholars, politicians, and journalists.

We spoke about terror by famine, which the Kremlin used against Ukraine,
while they claimed that the Stalinist repressions had no national component.
Only Sergey Kovalev, a former dissident, who in 1993 chaired the Human
Rights Commission in the Russian parliament, summoned the courage to say
"Forgive us!" while addressing the Ukrainian side.

Then a Moscow newspaper carried an article by the journalist Leonid
Kapeliushny, who wrote it after reading the book by Volodymyr Maniak and
Lidiia Kovalenko, Holod 33: Narodna Knyha-Memorial [Famine '33. The
People's Memorial Book]. In the book the journalist saw "eyewitness
testimonies that have legal force, testimonies of genocide witnesses"
(Izvestiia, 1993, July 3).

Kovaliov's "Forgive us" and Kapeliushny's conclusion were reinforced by
papers presented at the international scholarly conference "The Holodomor of
1932-1933 in Ukraine: Causes and Consequences," which took place in Kyiv
on Sept. 9-10, 1993 and was attended by the president of Ukraine. While
President Kravchuk blamed the tragedy of the Ukrainian nation on the
Stalinist government, Ivan Drach, who took the floor after him, placed this
problem in a different dimension.

"It is time to fully understand once and for all that this was only one of
the closest to us - surviving and now living Ukrainians - stages in the
planned eradication of the Ukrainian nation. Intolerance of this nation is
deeply rooted in the descendants of the northern tribes, to whom our people
gave its own faith, culture, civilization, and even its name," Drach said.

The Russian experts on the problems of collectivization and famine- Ilya
Zelenin, Nikolai Ivnytsky, Viktor Kondrashyn, and Yevgeniy Oskolkov -
wrote a collective letter to the editors of a historical journal of the
Russian
Academy of Sciences, expressing their concern over the fact that most
conference participants insisted on "a certain exceptionality of Ukraine, a
special nature and substance of these events in the republic as opposed to
other republics and regions in the country."

They claimed that the famine in Ukraine was no different from famines in
other regions, whereas the anti-peasant policy of the Stalinist leadership
had no clearly defined national direction (Otechestvennaia istoriia
[National History], 1994, no. 6, p. 256).

In an attempt to substantiate their position, the Russian colleagues
emphasized the socioeconomic aspects of the 1932-1933 famine, quoting
my paper presented at that conference. Without a doubt, the Kremlin's
economic policy did not distinguish among the national republican borders,
and in this respect their arguments were flawless.

However, the rejection of the Ukrainian specifics of the famine, led the
Russian colleagues, whether they wanted to or not, to state that the
Kremlin had no nationality policy or repressive element of such a policy.

I heard a similar statement to the effect that "Stalin's victims have no
nationality" from a different Russian delegation at an international
symposium in Toronto, entitled "The Population of the USSR in the
1920s-1930s in the Light of New Documentary Evidence" (February 1995).
However, Soviet history knows many cases of ethnically motivated
repressions. Is it worthwhile recounting them all?

In recent years the Institute of Ukrainian History has established
cooperation with the Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of
Sciences, and through it with experts at other Russian institutions as part
of the Russian-Ukrainian Commission of Historians (co-chaired by the
Ukrainian academician Valeriy Smoliy and Russian academician Aleksandr
Chubarian).

On March 29, 2004, Moscow hosted the commission's meeting, attended by
numerous prominent Russian experts on agrarian history. They discussed the
book Holod 1932-1933 rokiv v Ukraini: prychyny ta naslidky [The Famine of
1932-1933 in Ukraine: Causes and Consequences], published in 2003 by the
Institute of Ukrainian History to coincide with the 70th anniversary of the
Holodomor.

Thirty authors collaborated on this large-format volume of 888 pages
supplemented with a 48-page section of illustrations.

Several copies of the book were sent to Moscow long before the
commission's meeting. Yet it failed to convince the Russian historians.

Soon after that meeting Viktor Danilov and Ilya Zelenin publicized their
views of the problem discussed in an article that appeared in
Otechestvennaia istoriia (no. 5, 2004). The gist of their position is
reflected in the title of their article: "Organized Famine. Dedicated to the
70th Anniversary of the Peasants' Common Tragedy."

The journal printed a black band around the authors' names; our opponents
died soon after the meeting. It is a great loss for Russian historical
scholarship and all of us, since aspiring Russian scholars are not all that
keen to explore these "complex problems."

New archival documents on Soviet agrarian history are now circulating among
scholars. This has become possible primarily thanks to the tremendous
efforts of Viktor Petrovich Danilov. The new additions to the source base
have significantly reinforced the position of the Ukrainian side in its
attempts to convince the world that the Holodomor was indeed an act of
genocide.

Summing up the results of our meeting on March 29, 2004, Danilov and
Zelenin came to the following conclusion: "If one is to characterize the
Holodomor of 1932-1933 as 'a purposeful genocide of Ukrainian peasants,'
as individual historians from Ukraine insist, then we must bear in mind that
it was in equal measure a genocide of Russian peasants." The Ukrainian side
can accept such a conclusion.

After all, we are not saying that only Ukrainians were Stalin's victims.
Moreover, because of the specifics of "socialist construction" and the
nature of the political system, between 1918 and 1938 the hardest hit
(percentage of the total) by repressions were the immediate perpetrators of
Stalin's crimes - Chekist secret police agents, followed by state party
members, especially the Communist Party and the Soviet nomenklatura,
followed by citizens of the national republics, and finally Russians.

How can one explain the Russian scholars' restraint when it comes to the
question of genocide? It may perhaps be explained by the fact that the
international community is using the Dec. 9, 1948, Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide more and more actively.
In January 2004 Stockholm hosted the international forum "Preventing
Genocide: Threats and Responsibility," which was attended by many heads
of state.

The forum focused on the following questions: the political, ideological,
economic, and social roots of violence connected with genocide; mechanisms
for preventing and responding to the threat of genocide at the international
level; the use of diplomatic, humanitarian, economic, and forceful means to
prevent genocide.

In Ukrainian society only marginal right-leaning politicians insist that
present-day Russia is responsible for the Ukrainian Holodomor and demand
moral or even financial compensation. However, the fact that Russia has been
recognized as the legal successor of the USSR does not burden it with
responsibility for the crimes of the Bolsheviks, White Guards, or any other
regimes that controlled Russian territory in the past.

Even the attempts of the Kremlin leadership to associate itself with certain
attributes of the former Soviet Union, as evidenced by the melody of
Russia's
state anthem, are not reason enough to put forward such claims. After all,
nostalgia for the Soviet past is equally present in Ukrainian and Russian
societies, mainly in the older generations.

Russia is freely publishing documentary collections that reflect the state
crimes of the Stalinist period. In fact, it has become possible to build the
concept of the Ukrainian Holodomor as an act of genocide only on the
basis of documents publicized in Moscow.

At the same time, Russia's attempts to inherit the achievements of the
Soviet epoch, especially the victory in World War II, are forcing Russian
officials to throw a veil over Stalin's crimes as much as this can be done
in the new conditions of freedom from dictatorship. This applies
particularly to the crime of genocide, even though the Dec. 9, 1948,
Convention does not place responsibility on the legal successors of
criminal regimes.

Naturally, if Russia wants to inherit the accomplishments of the Soviet
epoch, it must also inherit its negative aspects, i.e., the obligation to
utter Kovalev's "Forgive us." The European Parliament hinted at this
"liability" in 2004, when it found the deportation of the Chechens to be an
act of genocide. However, few would like to inherit moral responsibility for
the crimes of previous regimes, unless absolutely necessary.

This is why Russia is a decisive opponent of recognizing the Ukrainian
Holodomor as an act of genocide. In August 2003 Russian Ambassador to
Ukraine Viktor Chernomyrdin said in an interview with BBC's Ukrainian
Service: "The Holodomor affected the entire Soviet state. There were no
fewer tragedies and no less pain in the Kuban, Ural, and Volga regions, and
Kazakhstan.

Such expropriations did not just happen in Chukotka and the northern regions
because there was nothing to expropriate." Russia's official representatives
at the UN did everything possible to have the definition of the Holodomor as
an act of genocide excluded from the Joint Statement of 36 nations on the
70th anniversary of the Ukrainian Holodomor.

It remains for us to convince the Russians that the Ukrainian famine was a
result of not only repressive grain procurements, but also a perfectly
organized campaign to seize all food stocks from peasants. There is a body
of evidence to this effect, and if the voices of Ukrainian scholars are
reinforced by the voices of Western historians, this goal will become
practicable.

POSITION OF WESTERN RESEARCHERS

A closely interconnected network of research institutions specializing in
so-called Sovietology formed in the West during the Cold War. However, no
Sovietologists were interested in what happened in Ukraine in 1932-1933.

After moving to the US, Robert Conquest, an English literary scholar and
contemporary of the Russian revolution, started to work at Columbia
University's Institute for the Study of the USSR. He is the author of the
first book of non-Ukrainian historiography on the Great Famine in the
USSR, which was published in 1986.

The author of this famous work, The Great Terror, was right to define
Stalin's policy in Ukraine as a special kind of terror - terror by famine.
Robert Conquest's book The Harvest of Sorrow was based on literary
sources, most of them collected by James Mace.

The international community found the book sensational. On the contrary,
Sovietologists disapproved of it and accused the author of political bias,
because the book was commissioned by the Ukrainian Diaspora.

In the late 1980s a "revisionist" trend emerged in the ranks of
Sovietologists. Its representatives believed that Cold War historiography
had to be revised because it was ideologically opposed to communism, i.e.,
it went beyond the bounds of scholarly knowledge.

The "revisionists" unleashed a torrent of criticism against the publications
of the US Congressional Commission on the Ukraine Famine. Mace himself
recalled that he was accused of falsifying history. With no prospects for
steady employment in the US, Mace moved to Kyiv and found a job at the
institute, which had been organized by Ivan Kuras on the foundations of the
former Institute of Party History at the CC CPU.

Much like during the Soviet period, in the early post-Soviet years Ukrainian
historical studies did not have an independent international status. In
contrast, Russian historians only had to strengthen their long-standing
ties. The international status of Russian scholarship rose sharply with the
opening of archives from the Stalinist period.

In 1992 Viktor Danilov launched a theoretical seminar entitled "Modern
Concepts of Agrarian Development" at the Interdisciplinary Academic Center
of Social Sciences (Intercenter). During its meeting on June 24, 1997, the
participants discussed the work of Stephen Wheatcroft (Australia) and Robert
Davies (UK) entitled The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931-1933. The
journal Otechestvennaia istoriia (no. 6, 1998) devoted dozens of pages to a
report on this seminar. It is hard to describe it in several paragraphs, but
I will try.

In his introduction Wheatcroft condemns the thesis that it was an "organized
famine" and that Stalin purposefully seized grain to cause the peasants to
starve. The report focuses much attention on Ukraine.

It states that the Kremlin did not know anything, and when information about
the famine started to come in, "the Politburo of the Central Committee of
the All-Union Communist Party (Bolshevik) was addressing the increasingly
pressing problem of dispensing additional grain [to the peasants - Auth.]."
Between February and July 1933 the CC AUCP(b) and the Council of People's
Commissars of the USSR issued 35 resolutions and decrees to dispense food
grain.

That was the report. Interestingly enough, the cited facts were true. The
only thing that is not known is why millions of people died of hunger. Only
one document struck the researchers with its cynicism: a CC CP(b)U
resolution on dividing peasants hospitalized and diagnosed with dystrophy
into ailing and recovering patients. The resolution ordered improving the
nutrition of the latter within the limits of available resources so that
they could be sent out into the fields to sow the new crop as soon as
possible.

Of course, Stalin did not use terror by famine for the indiscriminate
extermination of all peasants for whatever reason. Those lucky enough to
survive were sent to perform agricultural labor and received food in the
fields while they worked. They received food dispensed according to special
resolutions from supreme government bodies. This was meant to show how
much the government cared about keeping its citizens alive. In this way the
peasants learned to work as part of state- owned collective farms.

Based on the authors' estimates, Roberta Manning of Harvard University
pointed out that before the 1933 harvest government stockpiles contained
between 1.4 and 2 million tons of grain. This was enough to prevent mass
hunger. "What forced the Soviet government to seize and export such a large
percentage of a very low harvest and stockpile more grain than it did during
the previous grain crises? These questions demand answers," she said in a
polite rebuttal of the basic points of the report.

On the contrary, Lynn Viola of the University of Toronto supported the view
of the 1932-1933 tragedy as outlined in the report primarily because it was
"revisionist," i.e., it differed from previous opinions about the famine
organized by the government or even an act of genocide committed by the
Stalinist leadership.

Yu. Moshkov agreed that peasants received food relief in the first half of
1933, but added to this obvious fact that "in my view, it is impossible to
deny Stalin's clear intent in the fall of 1932 to punish disobedient
peasants who refused to surrender everything including grain."

M. Viltsan used the points in the report to launch an attack against the
authors of the "concept of manmade famine" Nikolai Ivnytsky, Viktor
Kondrashyn, and Yevgeniy Oskolkov. Armed with facts, these three
repelled the attack.

This was the gist of the theoretical seminar at the Intercenter, with praise
for "revisionists" and attacks against Russian scholars who called the
famine of 1932-1933 "manmade" in the face of irrefutable facts. It is not
surprising that they did not dare go one step further and call the Ukrainian
famine an act of genocide.

This seminar reflected the way the Holodomor was comprehended in the West
in the late 1990s. The situation has improved significantly. It appears that
the turning point came during the international conference organized by the
Institute for Historical and Religious Studies in Vicenza, Italy, in October
2003. I will not dwell on its work, because James Mace wrote about it in one
of The Day's October 2003 issues.

Its result was a resolution supported by scholars from Italy, Germany,
Poland, Ukraine, the US, and Canada (Ivnytsky and Kondrashyn abstained),
urging the prime minister of Italy, Silvio Berlusconi, who was then holding
the EU's rotating presidency, and European Commission chairman Romano
Prodi to apply efforts to have the Ukrainian famine 1932-1933 recognized
internationally as an act of genocide.

The Vicenza conference had a sequel. On Sept. 5, 2005, Kyiv-Mohyla
Academy launched a book entitled Death of the Land. The Holodomor in
Ukraine of 1932-1933. This event was attended by Italy's Ambassador to
Ukraine Fabio Fabbri and the director of the Italian Institute in Ukraine,
Nicola Balloni.

The book is based on the materials presented at the Vicenza conference.
Nadia Tysiachna's article (Sept. 13, 2005) on this presentation bore the
same title that James Mace used for the newspaper column that he sent from
Vicenza: "Intellectual Europe on the Ukrainian Genocide."

University of Koln professor Gerhard Simon, who participated in the Vicenza
conference, organized a discussion panel entitled "Was the 1932-1933 Famine
in Ukraine an Act of Genocide?" at the 7th International Congress of
Historians in Berlin, held in July 2005. This question touched off a heated
debate. I am grateful to Dr. Simon for sacrificing the presentation of his
own report to give me additional time to substantiate my position.

I am also grateful to him for his assistance in having my article translated
into German and published in the reputable magazine Ost Europa. The
entire staff of the Institute of Ukrainian History is thankful to this
authoritative expert on the history of Central and Eastern Europe for his
interest in the problem of the Holodomor and his article published in
Ukrainskyi istorychnyi Zhurnal [Ukrainian Historical Journal], which is a
fresh contribution to the German historiography on this problem.

PEERING INTO THE ABYSS

It is obvious that comprehending the Holodomor is no simple task for
Ukrainian and foreign scholars, Ukrainian society, and the international
community. Do we know everything that happened in our Ukraine seven or
eight decades ago? Have we broken free of the stereotypes that were
inculcated into the consciousness of several generations?

Sometimes in the face of new or reconsidered facts one has to give up one's
established views of certain aspects of the past. This is a normal thing for
a professional historian. This is the meaning of scholarly quest. At the
start of Gorbachev's de-Stalinization one impulsive woman could no longer
endure it and screamed out loud for all of the Soviet Union to hear: "I
cannot give up my principles!" She could not find the courage to peer into
the abyss and see how much Leninist ideology differs from Leninist and
Stalinist practice.

We have to squeeze the hypocrisy of the Soviet period out of ourselves one
drop at a time. The sooner our society liberates itself from the stereotypes
of the previous epoch, the easier its life will be. The truth about the
Holodomor can become a powerful lever in this process.

What is this truth? In the coming issues I will propose my version of the
1932-1933 events in Ukraine. Readers who have read this historiographic
introduction in the form of these four articles should make their own
judgments based on the facts currently in possession of historians.

The upcoming articles will address the essence of the communist "revolution
from the top," the Kremlin's nationality policy, mechanisms of genocide, and
other subjects that together can provide the answer to the question of why
Stalin exterminated the Ukrainians. -30- (To be continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://www.day.kiev.ua/153028/; Part V to be published soon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR"
An Agent Of Change
A Free, Not-for-profit, Independent, Public Service Newsletter
ARTICLES ARE FOR PERSONAL AND ACADEMIC USE ONLY
Articles are Distributed For Information, Research, Education
Discussion and Personal Purposes Only
========================================================
NOTE: The new book, "Day and Eternity of James Mace"
published by The Day in Kyiv, in English or in Ukrainian, is available
from the www.ArtUkraine.com Information Service. If you are
interesting in finding out how to order the new book please send an
e-mail to ArtUkraine.com@starpower.net. EDITOR
=======================================================
UKRAINE INFORMATION WEBSITE: http://www.ArtUkraine.com
========================================================
SigmaBleyzer/Bleyzer Foundation Economic Reports
"SigmaBleyzer - Where Opportunities Emerge"
The SigmaBleyzer Private Equity Investment Group offers a comprehensive
collection of documents, reports and presentations presented by its business
units and organizations. All downloads are grouped by categories:
Marketing; Economic Country Reports; Presentations; Ukrainian Equity Guide;
Monthly Macroeconomic Situation Reports (Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine).
LINK: http://www.sigmableyzer.com/index.php?action=downloads
You can be on an e-mail distribution list to receive automatically, on a
monthly basis, any or all of the Macroeconomic Situation Reports (Romania,
Bulgaria, Ukraine) by sending an e-mail to mwilliams@SigmaBleyzer.com.
"UKRAINE - A COUNTY OF NEW OPPORTUNITIES"
========================================================
"WELCOME TO UKRAINE" &
"NARODNE MYSTETSTVO" MAGAZINES
UKRAINIAN MAGAZINES: For information on how to subscribe to the
"Welcome to Ukraine" magazine in English, published four times a year
and/or to the Ukrainian Folk Art magazine "Narodne Mystetstvo" in
Ukrainian, published two times a year, please send an e-mail to:
ArtUkraine.com@starpower.net.
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT- AUR" - SPONSORS
"Working to Secure & Enhance Ukraine's Democratic Future"

1. THE BLEYZER FOUNDATION, Dr. Edilberto Segura, Chairman;
Victor Gekker, Executive Director, Kyiv, Ukraine; Washington, D.C.,
http://www.bleyzerfoundation.com.
Additional supporting sponsors for the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) are:
2. UKRAINIAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA (UFA), Zenia Chernyk,
Chairperson; Vera M. Andryczyk, President; Huntingdon Valley,
Pennsylvania
3. KIEV-ATLANTIC GROUP, David and Tamara Sweere, Daniel
Sweere, Kyiv and Myronivka, Ukraine, 380 44 298 7275 in Kyiv,
kau@ukrnet.net
4. ESTRON CORPORATION, Grain Export Terminal Facility &
Oilseed Crushing Plant, Ilvichevsk, Ukraine
5. Law firm UKRAINIAN LEGAL GROUP, Irina Paliashvili, President;
Kiev and Washington, general@rulg.com, www.rulg.com.
6. BAHRIANY FOUNDATION, INC., Dr. Anatol Lysyj, Chairman,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
7. VOLIA SOFTWARE, Software to Fit Your Business, Source your
IT work in Ukraine. Contact: Yuriy Sivitsky, Vice President, Marketing,
Kyiv, Ukraine, yuriy.sivitsky@softline.kiev.ua; Volia Software website:
http://www.volia-software.com/ or Bill Hunter, CEO Volia Software,
Houston, TX 77024; bill.hunter@volia-software.com.
8. ODUM- Association of American Youth of Ukrainian Descent,
Minnesota Chapter, Natalia Yarr, Chairperson
9. UKRAINE-U.S. BUSINESS COUNCIL, Washington, D.C.,
Dr. Susanne Lotarski, President/CEO; E. Morgan Williams,
SigmaBleyzer, Chairman, Executive Committee, Board of Directors;
John Stephens, Cape Point Capital, Secretary/Treasurer
10. UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COORDINATING COUNCIL (UACC),
Ihor Gawdiak, President, Washington, D.C., New York, New York
11. U.S.-UKRAINE FOUNDATION (USUF), Nadia Komarnyckyj
McConnell, President; John Kun, Vice President/COO; Vera
Andruskiw, CPP Wash Project Director, Washington, D.C.; Markian
Bilynskyj, VP/Director of Field Operations; Marta Kolomayets, CPP
Kyiv Project Director, Kyiv, Ukraine. Web: http://www.USUkraine.org
12. WJ Grain, Kyiv, Ukraine, David Holpert, Chief Financial Officer,
Chicago, Illinois.
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR" is an in-depth, private,
independent, not-for- profit news and analysis international newsletter,
produced as a free public service by the non-profit www.ArtUkraine.com
Information Service (ARTUIS) and The Action Ukraine Report Monitoring
Service The report is distributed in the public's interesting around the
world FREE of charge. Additional readers are always welcome.
TO GET ON OR OFF THE DISTRIBUTION LIST
If you would like to read "THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT- AUR"
please send your name, country of residence, and e-mail contact
information to morganw@patriot.net. Additional names are welcome. If
you do not wish to read "THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT" around
five times per week, let us know by e-mail to morganw@patriot.net. If
you are receiving more than one copy please contact us and again please
contact us immediately if you do not wish to receive this Report.
===================================================
PUBLISHER AND EDITOR - AUR
Mr. E. Morgan Williams, Director, Government Affairs
Washington Office, SigmaBleyzer Private Equity Investment Group
P.O. Box 2607, Washington, D.C. 20013, Tel: 202 437 4707
Mobile in Kyiv: 8 050 689 2874
mwilliams@SigmaBleyzer.com; www.SigmaBleyzer.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director, Ukrainian Federation of America (UFA)
Coordinator, Action Ukraine Coalition (AUC)
Senior Advisor, U.S.-Ukraine Foundation (USUF)
Chairman, Executive Committee, Ukraine-U.S. Business Council
Publisher, Ukraine Information Website, www.ArtUkraine.com
Member, International Ukrainian Holodomor Committee
=======================================================
Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
=======================================================

return to index [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
=======================================================

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR - Number 606


"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR"
An International Newsletter
The Latest, Up-To-Date
In-Depth Ukrainian News, Analysis, and Commentary

"Ukrainian History, Culture, Arts, Business, Religion,
Sports, Government, and Politics, in Ukraine and Around the World"

UKRAINIANS COMMEMORATE FIRST ANNIVERSARY
OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION


STANDING ON THE MAIDAN IN 2004 AND 2005

For the thousands of us who were fortunate to have the opportunity
to stand on the Maidan on November 22, 2004 and November 22,
2005 it is clear the people have it right. They are standing in the right
place for the right objectives. The politicians and the government now
need to do more to get it right and what is stopping them from
getting it right needs to be changed, such as the Soviet style
governmental organizational structure still in place.

As one astute Ukrainian official said, "The powers seem unable to
deliver to the people what the people want." EDITOR

"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR" - Number 606
Mr. E. Morgan Williams, Publisher and Editor
FROM: KYIV, UKRAINE, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2005

--------INDEX OF ARTICLES--------
"Major International News Headlines and Articles"

1. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT YUSHCHENKO RALLIES SUPPORTERS
ON ANNIVERSARY OF ORANGE REVOLUTION
Ukraine is on the right track...do not give up hope
UT1 State TV, Kiev, Ukraine, in Ukrainian, 22 Nov 05
BBC Monitoring Service, UK, in English, Wednesday, Nov 23, 2005


2. KIEV CITIZENS KEEP FAITH WITH THE ORANGE REVOLUTION
Chris Stephen reports on the turmoil and political
in-fighting which has dominated Ukraine in the past year
Chris Stephen, Irish Times, Ireland, Wed, Nov 23, 2005

3. YUSHCHENKO MARKS FIRST ORANGE ANNIVERSARY
By Tom Warner in Kiev, Financial Times
London, UK, Tuesday, November 22 2005

4. ONE YEAR ON, UKRAINE'S ORANGE REVOLUTION PALES
70 per cent of orange revolution supporters are now disillusioned
By Askold Krshelnycky in Kiev, Independent
London, UK, Wednesday, 23 November 2005

5. SACKED PRIME MINISTER YULIA TYMOSHENKO UPSTAGES
PRESIDENT VICTOR YUSHCHENKO AT MASS UKRAINE RALLY
By Ron Popeski, Reuters, Kiev, Ukraine, Tue Nov 22, 2005

6. A CHANGED, BUT DIVIDED UKRAINE MARKS 'ORANGE
REVOLUTION' ANNIVERSARY
Agence France Presse (AFP), Kiev, Ukraine, Tuesday, Nov 22, 2005

7. YUSHCHENKO URGES UKRAINIANS TO BE PROUD OF
CHANGES, PATIENT WITH REFORMS
AP INTERVIEW: Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko
Mara D. Bellaby, AP Worldstream, Kiev, Ukraine, Tues, Nov 22, 2005

8. ORANGE REVOLUTION PROTESTS BITTERSWEET
Natasha Lisova, AP Online, Kiev, Ukraine, Tue, Nov 22, 2005

9. REVOLUTION IN UKRAINE: ONE YEAR ON.
WILL THE CIS TURN ORANGE?
OPINION & ANALYSIS: By Arseny Oganesyan,
RIA Novosti political commentator
Russian News & Information Agency, RIA Novosti
Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Nov 22, 2005

10. EUROPEAN UNION PRAISES UKRAINE'S ORANGE ANNIVERSARY
Agence France Presse (AFP), Brussels, Belgium, Tues, November 22 2005

11. FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION
George Bush's Presidential Message
THE WHITE HOUSE, Office of the Press Secretary
Washington, D.C., Tuesday, November 22, 2005

12. UKRAINIANS COMMEMORATE FIRST ANNIVERSARY
OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION
Associated Press (AP), Kiev, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

13. HOW UKRAINE 'VERGED ON CIVIL WAR'
By Olexiy Solohubenko, BBC News, Kiev
BBC NEWS, United Kingdom, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

14. THE RING'S LOSS, UKRAINE'S GAIN
Vitali Klitschko, the WBC heavyweight champion of the world
COMMENTARY: By Gordon Marino
Financial Times, London, United Kingdom, Tue, Nov 22, 2005

15. UKRAINIAN ARTIST HNIZDOVSKY: OF MEN AND BEASTS
Lviv residents fulfill Yakiv Hnizdovsky's last request 20 years later
By Iryna YEHOROVA, The Day
The Day Weekly Digest in English, #37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

16. ANNUAL ST. PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE
COMMEMORATION ATTRACTS THOUSANDS
Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA)
New York, New York, Monday, November 21, 2005

17. A GIFT FROM AMERICA
Jackson-Vanik amendment repealed by half
By Serhiy SOLODKY, The Day
The Day Weekly Digest in English, #37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

18. UKRAINE GRADUATED FROM JACKSON-VANIK AMENDMENT
The Federation of Jewish Communities of the CIS (FJC)
Moscow & New York, Tuesday, November 22 2005
========================================================
1
. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT YUSHCHENKO RALLIES SUPPORTERS
ON ANNIVERSARY OF ORANGE REVOLUTION
Ukraine is on the right track...do not give up hope

UT1 State TV, Kiev, Ukraine, in Ukrainian, 22 Nov 05
BBC Monitoring Service, UK, in English, Wednesday, Nov 23, 2005

President Viktor Yushchenko has said that Ukraine is on the right track and
urged supporters not to give up hope for the Orange Revolution he led a year
ago.

In a 55-minute speech to a large crowd gathered on Kiev's Independence
Square (Maydan) to commemorate the first anniversary of the start of mass
protests, which was broadcast live by most of Ukraine's main TV channels,
Yushchenko said that the revolution had made people proud to be Ukrainian.

Yushchenko said that "private ambition" was behind the accusations of
corruption that resulted in the breakdown of the orange coalition and the
dismissal of the government of Yuliya Tymoshenko and other top officials in
September.

He closed by urging the team that backed his presidential bid to reunite
ahead of the March 2006 parliamentary election in order to preserve the new
freedoms won by the revolution.

The following is an excerpt from Yushchenko's speech broadcast by Ukrainian
state-owned television UT1 on 22 November:

Dear Ukrainian community, dear glorious Maydan, dear friends, dear sworn
brothers!

Today I am proud that after 12 months of decent, beautiful and interesting
Ukrainian life we are celebrating the first anniversary of Ukrainian
freedom. It is true that after 14 years, independence has come to the
Ukrainian land. I know that everyone who came to this Maydan is here because
they love Ukraine very much.

Today is possibly not an easy time and we are discussing how we got along
during these 12 months, where we have been disappointed, where we have
victories, whether we are following the right path, whether we missed our
way, and many, many other problems that honest people have. And therefore my
speech, my dears, will be devoted to one point - the faith [words
indistinct], how to come out of every Maydan with the faith that we are
going the right way.

Dear friends... [interrupted by people chanting "Yulya"]

Please, yell out Yulya once again and I will make my speech. I am ready to
hear this... [shouts are heard]

SAYS UKRAINE IS ON THE RIGHT TRACK

The time has come, my dears... my dears, let's be tactful, the time will
come, but today we have to answer the questions that worry every decent and
honest person who came to this Maydan. We need to sort out honestly what is
going on - without any masks, without any acting, to tell people honestly
what we are living with, what is happening now, and what we are going to do.

I came here with my family and with the children who helped me to come out
and climb onto this stage 12 months ago. They were with me then. Our
grandchildren and my family are also here with me. Each one of us has paid
for what we call freedom. Each one of us. I paid my own price, each one of
us paid his own price.

My mother who died several days after my inauguration also paid her price,
without recovering consciousness because not every healthy person could
endure the fight against the gang that we had a year ago. We were united
then because we knew who we were fighting against.

I have a question. When we came to power, when people went to their offices
from this Maydan, why did they lose the ethics, the political morality that
kept them united here? Despite the fact that these were 20 different
political forces, we spoke about one thing then, we spoke about the ideals
of Maydan.

And, actually, I would like to speak today about the first lessons of the
first anniversary, of the Ukrainian Day of Freedom.

First of all, I want to address those who have given up, those whose heads
are bowed. My friends, as president of this country, I assert that we are
going the only possible right track, the road of freedom and fairness for
everyone. Any development, either political, economic or humanitarian is
based on three things: democracy, freedom and the rule of law.

Twelve months ago we were fighting for Ukraine to have these values. Here
millions of people said - it is not salaries that we need, we do not need
additional pensions, but make sure that this country has honest authorities.
In other words, they wanted the right to choose, freedom and the rule of
law, so that no one could torture you anymore.

During the 12 months on this road, I say that we have not lost our way. We
are still going this way. But let's appreciate the challenge, dear
community. It is obvious that it takes more than one month to create
democracy, truth and freedom, human rights. Let's not cover Ukraine's head
with ashes just because after 12 months someone is disappointed. Do not be
hasty, especially when it concerns consumption. I am convinced that my
nation and my people have had 12 brilliant months.

[Passage omitted: praises the bravery of journalists, students, police and
TV channels a year ago; quotes poet Taras Shevchenko.]
Says revolution has made people proud to be Ukrainian

The 17 days of the Maydan gave birth to a new face of Ukraine. The world saw
a new country, a modern nation that can form the new face of Europe.

Today we feel Ukraine inside us in a new way. The absolute majority of
Ukrainians today consider Ukraine their common fatherland. There was a
breakthrough in all the regions, in all the social and language groups,
first of all, among youth and highly educated people.

Ninety per cent of Ukrainians consider Ukraine their only fatherland. Two
years ago, it was only 76 per cent of us. Ninety-four per cent of young
people believe Ukraine is their only fatherland. Two years ago, it was 87
per cent. Five years ago more than half of young Ukrainians would have
preferred to be born abroad.

Today we say loud and clear that we are the Ukrainian nation. We are proud
of being Ukrainians, and this is the biggest achievement of the Maydan. We
think in Ukrainian, we are reviving our roots, clearing our historic memory
of alien myths. This is not an easy process.

We failed to take the final step to find mutual agreement on the Ukrainian
view of the victory over the Nazi, so that the participants of World War II
[Soviet Army veterans] and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) could shake
hands. We have failed. But I believe that this step will be made and I will
do my best to overcome all the old quarrels in the country. [Passage
omitted: recalls famine victims]

GUARANTEES FAIR PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION

It is another achievement of Maydan that each one of us received the freedom
of choice. We have protected the right of every Ukrainian citizen to be able
to choose the authorities on his own.

I guarantee that from its very first day the 2006 parliamentary election
will be fair and transparent. Neither state offices, nor state premises or
state computers, or state cars will work for any political party during the
election to parliament in 2006.

Today on my way to the office I read a slogan at one of the road crossings -
it is time to answer. And there were three portraits: the former prime
minister [Yulia Tymoshenko], mine and the parliament speaker [Volodymyr
Lytvyn]. My friends, indeed I want to answer every question that arises from
a dialogue between the authorities and citizens, between the authorities and
business.

PRAISES ECONOMIC ACHIEVEMENTS

Various things have happened. But we have done many things that no-one has
ever done in this country. I am proud of this. I would like to communicate
some things officially, as an answer to those questions.

I am proud of the fact that in the last nine months 830,000 new jobs have
been created in Ukraine. In 12 months, there will be 1.1m new jobs. This was
what we dreamt of while standing on this square 12 months ago.

I am happy that Ukraine has, even using the official methodology of the
International Labour Organization, unemployment of 7.2 per cent. This is the
lowest level of unemployment in the 14 years of Ukraine's independence. I am
proud of this, because this is the work of Maydan too.

I want to say that I am proud of the fact that when 12 months ago we dreamt
of cutting the army service to 12 months, we did it. And today our boys who
have higher education serve nine months in the army, and those with
secondary education serve 12 months.

I am proud of the fact that 12 months ago we talked about withdrawing
Ukrainian troops from Iraq. And we will complete the third stage in 20-25
days, to pull the last soldier out of Iraq. We have done what we promised
Maydan.

We said that Kryvorizhstal [steelworks], stolen by the previous regime of
[former Prime Minister Viktor] Yanukovych, would be returned to the state
and privatized honestly in a repeat tender.

We have done that, and we have received proceeds in the state budget which
are 20 per cent higher than all of the privatization proceeds in all the
years. We are talking about just one asset. But we have dozens of these
strategic assets in Ukraine.

The question to the Yanukovyches, [former presidential administration head
Viktor] Medvedchuks and [former President Leonid] Kuchmas is - where are
those strategic assets? Where did they go? Where is the national budget?
Where is the medic, the soldier, the teacher?

We are talking about the new authorities, and their arrival will benefit
everyone, if these authorities are honest, democratic and professional.
Therefore, I am especially proud that in the past 10 years the salary of the
average Ukrainian citizen grew by 35 per cent. It is not that often that
real incomes grow by 24 per cent, that salaries of teachers, medics and
culture workers grow by 57 per cent. I think this is a rare performance in
our history. [Passage omitted: more praise for economic achievements]

SAYS FOREIGN RELATIONS IMPROVED

I would like to say that over this period the world and Europe got to know
Ukraine. We have had twice as many visitors from the European Union in the
last six months, after we cancelled visas for EU citizens.

In a few days, the Ukraine-EU summit will open in Kiev, chaired by Tony
Blair, where we hope to receive the market economy status. Two days ago, we
started official talks on liberalization of the visa regime for Ukrainians
visiting the EU. The US government has cancelled trade and customs sanctions
against Ukraine.

The Jackson-Vanik amendment has been cancelled. Many things have been done
to make sure that in the first quarter of 2006, Ukraine can become a member
of the World Trade Organization. We have done a lot of work here, especially
in recent days. But you see the disputes in parliament. We don't always find
unity of Ukrainian interests there.

I am happy that on 2 December Ukraine will receive 39 representatives of
foreign countries, more than 10 presidents and prime ministers, who will
attend a forum of democratic forces. I am happy that Ukraine is becoming a
regional leader. A leader that initiates the settlement not just of frozen
conflicts but also launches modern, interesting intercontinental projects.

PROMISES TO CORRECT ECONOMIC MISTAKES

But I believe, my dear friends, that we have enough courage to speak about
our mistakes. About what we failed to achieve. We have done a lot, but not
everything. And to ensure that Ukraine prospers, we must give answers to all
questions, including uncomfortable ones.

A lot of time has been wasted because of mistakes and miscalculations. There
have been obvious mistakes if we talk about what has befallen the country as
a result of administrative interference with the market, in particular, the
prices, the fuel, meat and sugar crises. I am convinced that this is not
something we should be proud of or should place on the altar of Ukrainian
heroism.

It is sad that Ukraine has closed economic zones, closed more than 500
projects, and many of them were run by investors who came and invested money
with an open soul, started their businesses in the hope of working for
Ukraine. It was an unfortunate mistake, which provoked a serious conflict
between the regional and central authorities and individual businesses. Over
the next week, we will finish fixing it.

We are finding answers to businesses' motivation to cancel VAT payments and
customs payments when talking about re-export operations. We are convinced
that the issue of so-called reprivatization could be handled more
appropriately. Without scaring investors by questioning the validity or
legitimacy of their projects. But I want to say that making mistakes is not
a problem. We should be happy and proud of the opportunity to correct these
mistakes.

REGRETS BREAK UP OF ORANGE TEAM,
ACCUSATION OF CORRUPTION

From the very first day of talking about the formation of the Ukrainian
authorities, I made my approach plain and clear. I had one criteria on the
basis of which I proposed the government and other executive institutions in
Ukraine should be formed.

The first position is that I offered the highest government posts, [posts
in] regional executive power, other institutions of power to the people who
stood behind me on Maydan. Some of these people were with me in the
parliamentary election [in 2002], some of them in the presidential race [in
2004], and won. There were no accidental people, and I want to stress that.
There were no people in the Ukrainian authorities other than those from
Maydan, the people who were accepted by Maydan.

These included [former state secretary Oleksandr] Zinchenko, [former
National Security and Defence Council Secretary Petro] Poroshenko, [current
National Security and Defence Council Secretary Anatoliy] Kinakh, [former
Prime Minister Yuliya] Tymoshenko, [current Interior Minister Yuriy]
Lutsenko, [former Deputy Prime Minister for Regional Policy Roman]
Bezsmertnyy, [former Transport Minister Yevhen] Chervonenko, [former Deputy
Prime Minister for Humanitarian Issues Mykola] Tomenko, [current Finance
Minister Viktor] Pynzenyk.

These are people who stood by me in the days of the Orange Revolution. These
are people who made the notable and important steps that are now referred to
as the Orange Revolution and the efforts we associate with this glorious
period. These are the faces that, as a matter of fact, made the revolution.

I delegated enough power to each one of them. And, I am confident today,
none of them complained that they lacked something. And I was happy how the
work started in these first days because I believed, and I am still
convinced, that these people are quite professional. These are people who
had a big political school behind them to bring benefits for this country.

And therefore I had a clear and specific hope. These people were a single
team here on stage, these people would be a single team when they move to
offices. But being in opposition, being on Maydan is different to working in
the office. And when I saw that month by month the team started losing its
team spirit, I told every side - friends, such processes are inadmissible. I
did this until the last day.

And I want to say once again that it is not important that from 6.5 per cent
GDP growth in January we fell back to minus 1.6 per cent in August. It is
not even important that we have burnt 2.5 billion of the trade surplus
during six months. Even the growth of prices for sugar or meat, sausages or
cereals is not important. I know figures for every item.

The worst thing is that the team which was united on this square became
different when they were in state offices. So the efforts I made in the last
weeks of August and in September - we were sitting until 2300 trying to
reconcile one side with the other. My demand was that they come to their
senses and shake hands with each other.

Maydan needs this, Ukraine needs this, and I needed to achieve the goals we
have set. I had an impression that they agreed. But then I was betrayed.
Then I gave them a chance once more. But it happened the way it happened.
Today I think it is another lesson of Maydan. We should draw conclusions. We
should not create myths, we should not create legends, but we should talk
about this honestly.

It was not Independence Square that brought corruption to this country. It
was not those people who are standing behind my back or those who were
standing behind my back 12 months ago who were the carriers of corruption.
But it happened that this label has stuck to the members of the Orange
Revolution, without proof, without a court, without a single fact so far.

Why did this collapse affect us. Because private ambitions began working
instead of the principles of Maydan. This was the problem that split the
team, these decent and wise people who were standing behind my back 12
months ago.

Dear friends, speaking about the choice, tests and lessons, I would like
very much that the team standing behind my back honestly learn these
lessons, that they don't lie, that they act and talk honestly.

Friends, I am asking you not to turn Maydan into the 2006 parliamentary
election. I am begging you. We are talking about Freedom Day. Let's be wise
and correct.

GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS SHOULD STICK TO THEIR OWN SECTOR

Second, friends. I am confident that Ukraine will be a democratic and free
country from now on and it won't be affected by any backtracking, which
would encroach on its democracy. Freedom of speech, freedom of choice,
including political choice, and the supremacy of law will rule in this
country. But we should honestly say that without changes, without movement
we will see the dead Ukraine that we had for 12-13 years before us. So we
should talk about the policy of changes, the policy of reform.

Dear friends, I would like very much for every government member to talk
about the tasks he faces. So that the deputy prime minister for humanitarian
issues does not speak about pension reform, saying: let us do it. Let us
reform education, which is deeply corrupt.

Let us make Ukrainian health care available to Ukrainians. I would like the
deputy prime minister for humanitarian issues to talk about these things. I
would like the economics minister to talk about the economy rather than the
National Security and Defence Council and its decisions.

I would like everyone working in the Ukrainian government and representing
it to bear responsibility since he is not in opposition, since he is
responsible for everything happening in the country. And the best thing they
can do is to be in charge of their own sector.

PLEDGES TO CONTINUE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION

We have great tasks for the future. I would like to emphasize the main idea
for all of you. We should feel stronger and more united after this
celebration of the first year of Ukraine's freedom. I am sure that each one
of us should understand that we want to see wealthy Ukrainians. We should
carry out changes and ensure Ukraine's movement. I would like to talk about
the tasks for 2006.

I would like to begin with what we started on this square - the fight
against corruption. I would like to say that it was not Independence Square
that brought corruption to Ukraine. Corruption flourished in this country
for over 10 years from top to bottom. And in the rating of the most corrupt
countries Ukraine never did better than No 120. But what did Maydan bring?

Maydan allowed us to talk about this problem for the first time. Fifteen
months ago no state official, an ordinary person or journalist could say
much about corruption in this country. But they knew well that it existed in
the doctor's office, school, university or a state official's office.

We have worked out a plan to fight corruption, which cannot be fulfilled in
five or 12 months. This is an evil we should fight for perhaps more than a
year. But we said during the first year that, number one, corruption will be
seriously minimized if honest people come to work as officials, and their
moral values, God, Bible and their spirituality will not allow them to cross
the line beyond which corruption begins.

We have replaced several thousand officials. This was the job of the first
seven-eight months. Nobody has ever did this much. Not everybody have been
reached. Not everyone was defined correctly. Some should be reviewed again
and maybe even for the third time, because we are talking about the new
Ukrainian authorities which are based on moral values. They should have
their new style. Let us be patient in this respect. This is an extremely
serious issue.

Paragraph two of the corruption issue. Do we have officials who have
extremely broad remits? Clearly yes. We have begun revising executive
decisions, laws, government resolutions and presidential decrees. It turned
out that out of 9,000 regulations over 5,000 should be cancelled so that we
can have transparent and competitive rules, a clear procedure for
appointments, licences and tenders. Two weeks ago parliament approved two
good laws on regulatory policy. Over six months we will seriously review the
functions of state officials.

CRITICIZES JUDICIARY, PROSECUTION SERVICE

The third point is about the court system and the prosecutor's office. We
have a corrupt court system. Twelve months ago we said here - where can we
find justice, in which court in this country? Back them we announced - the
main stage in combating corruption should be the conduct of fundamental
judicial reform because few are pleased with the courts the way they are
today. A minority is pleased with it while a majority is not.

When a few days ago a district court passed a ruling that a presidential
decree on the dismissal of the prosecutor-general [Svyatoslav Piskun] should
be overturned, this was perceived as a joke. When the president acts in line
with a constitutional provision, which is not subject to revision by any
court except the Constitutional Court, a district court today demonstrates
that it can spit on the rules of this country, on this democracy, on
everything because they have always had impunity.

The Prosecutor-General's Office is a big problem. I am convinced that until
recently it was a political institution, an institution with political
amnesty. Hundreds and thousands of cases had been forwarded there over eight
months involving 77 heads of district administrations, 19 heads of regional
administrations, three heads of regional councils, more than 1,000
state-level officials.

Over nine months of work by the prosecutor's office, we have not received a
single decision to indicate that the prosecutor's office has fought economic
crime, abuse of office or corruption. Therefore, esteemed friends, I am not
bowing my head but looking you straight in the eye and saying - we should
reform the judiciary in this country to ensure the supremacy of law.

We should conduct profound reform of the prosecutor's office. This is our
contribution to the fight against corruption. Without this, we cannot answer
the question on how to purge corrupt figures from the executive branch of
power, from parliament, from local bodies of power.

[Passage omitted: talks about the need to increase salaries for judges and
officials as a way of combating corruption and bribery]

Dear friends, I am convinced that the steps I named and other steps
stipulated in the presidential decree will be the answer to the question of
how Ukraine will cope with the outrage which we have inherited from the
Yanukovych-Kuchma regime that is called corruption. We will manage it. But
friends, do not bend your heads and do not cover your heads in ashes. Not a
single nation has done it in weeks or months. Let's live up to the
challenge. [Passage omitted: talks about challenges in the education
system]

JUSTIFIES TALKING WITH OPPOSITION

I have to give answers to a number of comments that were made here. There
were comments on the memorandum between the authorities and the opposition
[signed with Yanukovych on 22 September]. I would like to say the following.

You remember how when we stood on this square 12 months ago, we heard about
the results of the meeting in Severodonetsk, which launched the political
initiative to create an Eastern-Ukrainian republic. They were political
outsiders who were looking for their salvation through the division of the
nation.

Then among all the European flags, among the many slogans of support for the
election campaign, there was one slogan - East and West together. I know how
a lot of people who stood on the orange Maydan brought food to the Dynamo
Stadium since those lads in tents had nothing but vodka with them.

You brought food to support that team, to shake hands and say: Lads, we are
citizens of Ukraine. There is a single Ukraine above us, irrespective of
your belief, irrespective of the language you speak, irrespective of what
political force you support - that is not so important.

Let us not set ourselves the goal of splitting the country. Yes, excuse me,
there is such a phenomenon in this country as Yanukovych. There is such a
phenomenon as opposition to the current authorities. There is. This is true.
I don't want to describe this phenomenon. But I want to tell you one thing.
Friends, when we say that Ukraine should be united, don't we have to talk
about it here? I am sure we do.

When we say that we will hold the 2006 election fairly - perhaps for the
first time in this country - isn't it worth talking to the opposition? It
is, because we are talking not about Yanukovych but about those people who
support other political forces and who are also Ukrainian citizens.

When we talk about the 2006 budget, should we support it and live with a
budget or not? When we talk about the WTO, should we talk about this or not?
For we cannot muster 226 votes among ourselves to support [bills needed for
Ukraine's WTO entry].

Friends, let's do our thinking as people who have come to power from Maydan
and who are responsible for the unity of the nation and the country.

CALLS FOR UNITY OF DEMOCRATIC FORCES IN
PARLIAMENT ELECTION

Therefore, dear friends, I call on you not to forget one of the values that
Maydan holds sacred - we are united. Nothing can separate us. I know what is
going to happen - to make one last stab in the back of the Ukrainian
nation - a vote on NATO, a referendum on the SES [Single Economic Space
with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan] and lots of other things that are intended
to demonstrate one thing at this difficult political time - Ukrainians, you
are different, you differ on NATO, you differ on the SES, you differ on the
WTO, you even speak different languages, you belong to different
denominations, you walk under different icons.

And I say to you - do not bend, my friends, do not swallow this sweet bait.
We have lived through this for 12 months. The main lesson that we have
learnt is, do we want to win the 2006 election? Yes, we do. There is only
one answer to this. The team standing behind my back should be united. They
should be on the same side. They should offer a hand to each other. [shouts
of approval]

If Ukraine is in the heart, we should remember one thing, the challenge -
[stops in the middle of sentence interrupted by shouts] Friends, I am here
to say serious things to you. Please, please, please.

The challenge we are facing in the 2006 parliamentary election is - it is
not about electing a parliament, it is not about electing a prime minister,
it is an answer to this - what we have earned over the last 12 months and
what we call Ukrainian freedom, Ukrainian democracy and Ukrainian liberty -
will this be preserved or will we turn this Ukrainian history over as our
inheritance to the previous regime. This is a most topical issue.

The orange coalition's being in the middle of a feud now is not the best
context for the 2006 election. It is not the best, but I was confident of
one thing. Maydan will unite them once again. Maydan will bring the people
together, because it is not about the egos of 15 or 20 people. I am
convinced that this is the will of tens of millions of Ukrainians.

We should secure the victory of democratic forces in March 2006. This is our
promise because a victorious election of the Ukrainian president can only be
victorious if there are democratic victories in the 2006 Ukrainian
parliament. This is a single body which cannot be torn apart.

Therefore, dear friends, speaking about this, I would like to appeal to all
of you who are present in this square today and who were in this square a
year ago. Ukraine needs all civil structures defending freedom, democracy
and human rights to be active and purposeful.

A watchful responsible media is needed to speak the truth to citizens.
Energetic entrepreneurs are needed to move the economy forward and to create
jobs. Ukraine needs the energy and patriotism of all citizens united by love
for their country and their freedom.

I swear to each of you - I am ready to do everything I can for our unity.
First and foremost, to unite the forces that were together on Maydan and
that profess its values. It is our mutual understanding that can guarantee
the changes that we have just talked about.

I remind you once again about the strength that Ukrainian freedom has given
us. From today on, we will celebrate Ukrainian Freedom Day. It will remind
us that if we are free and united, we will attain every aim that Maydan
identified as a national goal. A dream about a prosperous, free and
independent Ukraine will come true.

We lived that dream here and were proud of it. Glory to Ukrainian Maydan!
Glory to each one of you! Glory to the free Ukrainian nation! Glory to Lord
our God and glory to Ukraine! -30-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
2. KIEV CITIZENS KEEP FAITH WITH THE ORANGE REVOLUTION
Chris Stephen reports on the turmoil and political
in-fighting which has dominated Ukraine in the past year

Chris Stephen, Irish Times, Ireland, Wed, Nov 23, 2005

Ukraine's capital, Kiev, was bathed in orange last night as thousands of
people marked the anniversary of last year's pro-democracy demonstrations,
the so-called "Orange Revolution".

However, in line with the disappointment felt with the progress of the
government, numbers were drastically down on the crowds of 500,000 which
brought the city to a standstill a year ago.

Citizens bundled in orange scarves against the biting cold nevertheless
cheered last night and sang along to some of the pop tunes which had
entertained them each night during the Orange Revolution.

Last year's protests began when foreign observers accused former prime
minister Viktor Yanukovich of rigging the presidential election of November
2004 to ensure his victory. Three weeks of huge demonstrations, carried out
as armed police threatened to intervene, saw Yanukovich agree to hold new
elections, which Viktor Yushchenko won.

A year later, the Orange Revolution has lost much of its lustre, with
Yushchenko and his former ally in the pro-democracy leadership, Julia
Timoshenko, having gone their separate ways after an acrimonious split.

During the demonstrations, the pair were inseparable, forming a memorable
double-act - her attractive features contrasting with his pebble-dashed
face, the result of a poisoning attack by the secret police.

Yet, in power, the two repeatedly clashed. Timoshenko won plaudits for
attacking the corrupt privatisations of the former regime. Yushchenko
supporters accused her of populism by raising pensions and wages for state
workers last spring, a move which has resulted in a doubling of the national
debt to US$6 billion.

Timoshenko supporters in turn have accused Yushchenko of being soft on
corruption, and her criticism has fallen on fertile ground.

Many in Kiev were shocked at the opportunism of Yushchenko's 19-year-old
son, Andriy, who tried to patent the slogan of the Orange Revolution, "Tak",
meaning "Yes". Tee-shirts, scarves and badges with this slogan do a roaring
trade at city-centre souvenir stalls, but Ukrainians were dismayed that
anyone, least of all the president's son, could try to corner the market.

The second blow to Yushchenko's prestige came in the summer when he shook
hands with his former adversary, Yanukovich. This handshake came after
Timoshenko supporters in parliament refused to support Yushchenko.

Determined to get new laws passed, the president reached out to his former
enemy. But images of the two men shaking hands left many Ukrainians
wondering if he had gone back on promises made during the revolution.

In September, the two camps began trading insults, and Yushchenko sacked his
entire cabinet, including Timoshenko.

However, Timoshenko seized the limelight back from Yushchenko in
Independence Square last night. In an impassioned 20-minute address,
delivered without notes, she clearly won over the crowd of more than
100,000.

"I am certain that, just as we supported Viktor Yushchenko in the
presidential election, we must now unite to elect a prime minister who will
embody everything we fought for," said Timoshenko, tears welling in her
eyes.

"I want to dismiss all the rumours that it is Timoshenko versus Yushchenko.
This cannot be so, because this is the president that you and I helped bring
to power. We did it together."

Timoshenko told the crowd that only a united team of reformers could win the
March 2006 election to a parliament led by a prime minister with expanded
powers.

Yushchenko, looking uncomfortable, eventually issued a similar call at the
end of a speech lasting nearly an hour. "Do we want to win the 2006
parliamentary election? Yes, we do," Yushchenko said to modest applause from
the crowd.

"This team standing behind me must be united, must work together and extend
a hand to one another." -30-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
3. YUSHCHENKO MARKS FIRST ORANGE ANNIVERSARY

By Tom Warner in Kiev, Financial Times
London, UK, Tuesday, November 22 2005

President Viktor Yushchenko and his former prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko
reunited on Tuesday night to celebrate the first anniversary of their Orange
Revolution's street protests amid talk of a possible alliance between the
two estranged leaders.

With hundreds of thousands showing up in snowy weather to hear their
speeches, Mr Yushchenko and Ms Tymoshenko made no reference to the
differences that caused the president to fire Ms Tymoshenko two months ago.
Instead, they urged the crowd to vote for their pro-western, reformist
parties in parliamentary elections next March.

Analysts doubt the two leaders will manage to unite their teams on a single
electoral ticket next year, but Mykola Tomenko, an ally of Ms Tymoshenko,
said their parties could form an alliance with co-ordinated platforms and
joint campaign events while still appearing separately on the ballot.

"Today we are discussing the formation of an Orange government coalition,"
Mr Tomenko said at a press conference.

Tuesday's ceremony, which Mr Yushchenko has named "Freedom Day",
commemorates the start of protests one year ago against widespread
vote-rigging that marred the presidential election poll of November 21, when
prime minister Viktor Yanukovich was initially declared the winner. After
two weeks of protests brought the country to a standstill, the Supreme Court
cancelled the election and ordered a re-vote, which Mr Yushchenko won.

Mr Yushchenko rewarded Ms Tymoshenko, who helped lead the protests, by
naming her prime minister. In September, however, she was sacked after she
quarrelled publicly with his other allies. They also clashed over economic
policy, notably over the resale of state companies by the previous
administration of then president Leonid Kuchma.

The country last month re-sold the Kryvorizhtal steel mill to Mittal Steel
for $4.8bn (Euro 4.1bn, £2.8bn), $4bn more than that paid by investors close
to Mr Kuchma two years earlier.

The moves toward a reunion come as Mr Yushchenko's centre-right Our Ukraine
party and Ms Tymoshenko's centre-left Fatherland party are trailing Mr
Yanukovich's Regions party in the polls.

Hryhory Nemyria, an adviser to Ms Tymoshenko, said she had revived contacts
with Mr Yushchenko's camp earlier this month and had met his chief of staff,
Oleh Rybachuk.

Tuesday's events were marred slightly by clashes between police and
supporters of a rightwing group, Brotherhood, which planned to hold an
anti-Orange rally but was denied permission. -30-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
4. ONE YEAR ON, UKRAINE'S ORANGE REVOLUTION PALES
70 per cent of orange revolution supporters are now disillusioned

By Askold Krshelnycky in Kiev, Independent
London, UK, Wednesday, 23 November 2005

Crowds of Ukrainians waving orange flags descended on Kiev's main square
yesterday for anniversary celebrations marking the start of the orange
revolution.

Instead of a party, the setpiece event has become a blend of commemoration
and inquest into the dramatic events that brought down the government. The
muted tone has been set by a difficult first year for the two figures who
swept to power on the back of the populist protest: the opposition leader
turned President, Viktor Yushchenko, and the woman propelled into, and later
fired from, the prime minister's office, Julia Tymoshenko.

A year on, accusations that the orange government has failed to address the
endemic corruption that they campaigned against and to arrest key figures in
the administration of the disgraced Leonid Kuchma have soured the optimism.

Most damaging to Mr Yushchenko is the accusation that his office has stalled
the investigation into the murder of the investigative journalist Georgiy
Gongadze. Oleksandr Turchynov, who headed the Ukrainian Security Service
(SBU) following the orange revolution, said he believed the Gongadze
investigation had been stalled by the President himself.

Gongadze, whose headless corpse was discovered in November 2000, was a
serial critic of the Kuchma regime, but his killing has never been directly
linked to the former President. Mr Turchynov said the SBU had obtained
secret recordings implicating Mr Kuchma and senior colleagues in ordering
the journalist's abduction and the cover-up of his killing. The recordings
were provided by Mr Kuchma's former bodyguard, Mykola Melnychenko,
who fled to the US.

Mr Kuchma and others who figure on the recordings have denied involvement
and variously said they were fake or had been tampered with. But Mr
Turchynov said tests by SBU experts had determined the recordings were
authentic. "The tests had been completed and all that remained was for them
to be formally approved and handed to the prosecutor-general to lay charges.
It seems there are serious figures who do not want those who ordered the
killing to be brought to justice."

Mr Turchynov was ousted from office along with Ms Tymoshenko in September -
he is now a member of her political party.

Two police officers are in custody charged with actually carrying out the
murder. Last year The Independent named two men as supervising the abduction
of Gongadze: a Kuchma-era interior minster, Yuriy Kravchenko, who figures in
the recordings, and a police general, Oleksiy Pukach. Kravchenko was found
dead with two bullets in his head last March hours before he was due to be
questioned about the killing. Pukach fled, apparently abroad, and has not
been caught.

The dead end in the Gongadze probe is indicative of the public feeling that
little has changed. Senior police officers from the eastern city of Kharkov
who last year risked punishment by revealing how the Kuchma regime had
forced police and other government employees to collude in faking election
results, this week complained that little had changed.

Colonel Igor Bohadytsya said: "During his election campaign, Yushchenko
promised to reinstate within eight days those police officers who were
removed for refusing to take illegal orders, and he promised to remove those
who gave such orders. It's been a year and people like us have not been
reinstated and matters have got worse."

He said the initial hopes that the new government would enforce a clean-up
have faded. "Now they [corrupt officials] have got back up on their hind
legs and have dismissed honest people and laugh at us and ask what the
revolution we believed in so much achieved."

That question is echoing throughout the country, where 70 per cent of orange
revolution supporters are now disillusioned, according to recent polls.

People are dismayed that no prominent members of the old regime have been
brought to trial and many, including Ms Tymoshenko, claim Mr Yushchenko has
made a secret deal with Mr Kuchma and his cronies not to prosecute them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article328714.ece
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
5. SACKED PRIME MINISTER YULIA TYMOSHENKO UPSTAGES
PRESIDENT VICTOR YUSHCHENKO AT MASS UKRAINE RALLY


By Ron Popeski, Reuters, Kiev, Ukraine, Tue Nov 22, 2005

KIEV - Ukraine's dismissed prime minister seized the limelight from
President Viktor Yushchenko a year after Orange Revolution protests with an
electrifying appeal on Tuesday to join forces in next year's parliamentary
election.

Both Yushchenko and Yulia Tymoshenko, the premier he sacked in September,
told supporters in Kiev's Independence Square that only a united team of
reformers could win the March 2006 election to a parliament led by a prime
minister with expanded powers.

But Tymoshenko's impassioned 20-minute address, delivered without notes,
clearly won over a crowd of well more than 100,000 marking last year's mass
protests which helped propel the president to victory in the re-run of a
rigged poll.

"I am certain that just as we supported Viktor Yushchenko in the
presidential election, we must now unite to elect a prime minister who will
embody everything we fought for," Tymoshenko, tears welling in her eyes,
told the crowd.

"I want to dismiss all the rumors that it is Tymoshenko versus Yushchenko.
This cannot be so, because this is the president that you and I helped bring
to power. We did it together."

Tymoshenko's speech on what the liberal administration has proclaimed
"Freedom Day" was clearly aimed at the March election campaign.

It also sought to justify her eight months in charge of a government that
blew apart after splitting into rival camps, each accusing the other of
corruption.

As snow fell on the square, she told supporters: "My heart is with you. If
it didn't work the first time, it will next time round. We cannot stop with
things half finished."

PUBLIC CONFIDENCE SAPPED

Tymoshenko's dismissal dented the ratings of both leaders. It also sapped
public confidence among Ukrainians who had backed the ideals of mass
protests against election fraud and Yushchenko's calls to move Ukraine into
the European mainstream.

The Regions Party of Viktor Yanukovich, the rival Yushchenko defeated in
last year's lengthy election campaign, leads polls for the March contest
with more than 20 percent support.

Tymoshenko's Fatherland Party lies second with 17 percent and the
pro-presidential Our Ukraine commands about 12 percent.
Yushchenko looked distinctly uncomfortable, issuing a similar call for unity
at the end of an hour-long speech interrupted periodically by hecklers
shouting "Yulia, Yulia!"

"Do we want to win the 2006 parliamentary election? Yes, we do!" the
president, accompanied on stage by his wife and children, said to modest
applause from the crowd. "This team standing behind me must be united, must
work together and extend a hand to one another."

Tymoshenko, widely popular among rank-and-file voters for her rousing
speeches during last year's protests, was appointed prime minister last
February under an electoral pact.

During her tenure, Western investors took fright at calls for a sweeping
review of privatizations conducted under the previous administration. She
also clashed with Yushchenko over attempts to control fuel prices.

Her replacement, technocrat Yuri Yekhanurov, is seen as a transition figure
before the March election brings in new arrangements handing many
presidential powers to the prime minister and parliament. (Additional
reporting by Olena Horodetska) -30-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in a letter-to-the-editor today. Let us hear from you.
========================================================
6. A CHANGED, BUT DIVIDED UKRAINE MARKS 'ORANGE
REVOLUTION' ANNIVERSARY

Agence France Presse (AFP), Kiev, Ukraine, Tuesday, Nov 22, 2005

KIEV - President Viktor Yushchenko vowed that Ukraine was on the right
path as the ex-Soviet nation marked the first anniversary of its "orange
revolution," the mass protests that ousted an entrenched pro-Russian regime.

"I want to tell those whose hands have dropped, whose head is bowed:
Friends... I assure you that we are on the sole right path, the path of
freedom and justice for each person," Yushchenko told a cheering,
100,000-strong crowd in Kiev's central Independence Square, the epicenter
of last year's revolution.

The Ukrainian president called on the revolution's dream team -- the
political forces who supported him during the protests but have since split
up amid furious infighting -- to unite ahead of next year's key
parliamentary elections, which Yushchenko needs to win in order to continue
his pro-Western policies.

"The team behind me must be united," he said to roars from the crowd,
referring to leaders of political parties who joined him on the stage,
including fiery Yulia Tymoshenko, who split with the Ukrainian leader after
he fired her as prime minister two months ago.

"The 2006 election... is an answer to the question of whether we will be
able to save what we earned 12 months ago and call Ukrainian freedom and
Ukrainian democracy," Yushchenko said.

Tymoshenko, who addressed the crowd before the Ukrainian president, warned
that "today a comeback (by the former regime) is possible as never before. I
don't want us to let our guard down."

Yushchenko, who gave Tymoshenko a perfunctory peck on the cheek that fell
some way short of a sign of reconciliation, spoke from a stage set up in the
middle of Independence Square, where a year ago he launched the 17 days of
peaceful protests against a rigged presidential vote.

The demonstrations captivated the world, and in vital ways broke Russia's
traditional dominance over the ex-Soviet nation.

It also split the country. While the agrarian, nationalist,
Ukrainian-speaking west backed Yushchenko in the standoff, the pro-Moscow,
Russian-speaking east supported his electoral rival, former prime minister
Viktor Yanukovich, and the division is still deeply felt.

While central Kiev once again turned orange Tuesday, rallies featuring blue
and white -- the color of Yanukovich's campaign -- were held in the eastern
city of Donetsk and in the southern Crimean peninsula, which supported
Yanukovich during last year's ballot.

"This isn't a holiday for us," one Donetsk resident told Ukrainian
television. "Today is a day of regret," said another.

Yushchenko assumed power on vows of turning Ukraine, which for hundreds
of years was under Russian influence, on a pro-Western course, including
eventual membership in the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization.

Despite the national divisions during the protests, Yushchenko's approval
rating stood at nearly 73 percent three months after his inauguration in
late January.

But a lack of progress on reforms, corruption accusations against his
entourage and the split of the "orange" team has left many revolution
supporters disenchanted and have sent the ratings tumbling to just above 50
percent in October.

Nevertheless, Ukraine today is a different place from what it was a year
ago -- media scrutinize the government, competition among political parties
is flourishing and the country is surely, albeit slowly, moving on its
pro-European course, with the European Union having recently begun
negotiations on facilitating the visa regime with Kiev.

"This is a celebration of freedom," said Alexander Safonov, a 42-year-old
sailor and Kiev native who attended Tuesday's celebrations with his wife.
"Of course I'm a little bit disappointed... but at least now we have hope
for the future." -30-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
7. YUSHCHENKO URGES UKRAINIANS TO BE PROUD OF
CHANGES, PATIENT WITH REFORMS

AP INTERVIEW: Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko
Mara D. Bellaby, AP Worldstream, Kiev, Ukraine, Tues, Nov 22, 2005

KIEV - President Viktor Yushchenko, marking the first anniversary of the
Orange Revolution protests that helped bring him to power, on Tuesday called
on Ukrainians to be proud of the past year's accomplishments and to be
patient while reforms continue.

"There is no disappointment here," Yushchenko told The Associated Press in
an interview in his office before celebrations were to begin in downtown
Kiev.

The euphoria that followed the one-time opposition figure's dramatic rise to
the presidency has been followed by wide dissatisfaction with
slower-than-desired reforms and infighting in his government. But
Yushchenko, in the interview, said: "We have all that we need for change."

"Of course, it is difficult to change a country in 10 months," said
Yushchenko, wearing a tie in the shade of bright orange that was his
campaign's emblem.

Yushchenko took office in late January after winning a court-ordered rerun
of the disputed elections that brought hundreds of thousands of his
supporters into downtown Kiev for weeks of protest.

"Ukraine, maybe, has lived through the happiest year in its history,"
Yushchenko said, acknowledging that nostalgia was running high, especially
Tuesday.

Thousands of people descended on Independence Square on Tuesday to mark the
anniversary, many waving orange flags and wearing orange scarves. Columns of
Ukrainians, primarily from pro-Yushchenko western Ukraine, kept arriving in
the square as the sun went down and a light snow fell.

Yushchenko was scheduled to give the keynote address, and he appeared tense
as he talked about his country's accomplishments and the tasks that still
lie ahead.

"To be in opposition against somebody and ... make good speeches is one
thing," he said. "To enter office and do what is sometimes a rather gray job
is another issue, but it is important this work be effective and
professional."

Yushchenko insisted that the problems that remain to be solved, such as
corruption and fixing the country's broken judicial system, were inherited
problems.

"They were not created by Independence Square," Yushchenko said.

One issue that continues to dog Yushchenko is the breakup of the Orange
Revolution partners, particularly his fallout with the glamorous Yulia
Tymoshenko, who has moved into the opposition since Yushchenko fired her as
prime minister in September.

"It is pity that mutual accusations were put forward, which caused both
teams to lose their reputations," Yushchenko said. "Today when we talk about
the revolution anniversary, I'd like all sides to use it to form one voice
on the square, for each political force despite the personal ambitions of
its leader to understand a very simple thing: Only solidarity brings
success."

Yushchenko's party is in talks with Tymoshenko's bloc about reuniting in a
coalition after March's parliamentary election, but Tymoshenko's demand that
she again become prime minister remains a major stumbling block.

He said he could work with her again "if the mistakes that were made were
taken into account."

Yushchenko's face remains covered in pockmarks from the dioxin poisoning
that knocked him off the campaign trail for weeks last year and that many
suspect was committed by his enemies. Earlier this month, Yushchenko gave
fresh blood samples under Ukrainian supervision so the samples could be used
in any prosecution.

His spokeswoman, Irina Gerashchenko, said late Tuesday that the samples had
again confirmed dioxin poisoning. No one has yet been charged in connection
with the poisoning.

Meanwhile, Yushchenko touted the planned withdrawal of Ukraine's 876 troops
from Iraq by years end as one of his major accomplishments. -30-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
8. ORANGE REVOLUTION PROTESTS BITTERSWEET

Natasha Lisova, AP Online, Kiev, Ukraine, Tue, Nov 22, 2005

It was a far cry from last year when the hero and heroine of Ukraine's
Orange Revolution stood arm-in-arm on the Independence Square stage before
hundreds of thousands protesting election fraud. The slogan then was:
"Together We Are Many And We Can't Be Defeated."

On Tuesday, tens of thousands flooded Kiev's main square, many hoping - even
pleading - for a reconciliation between President Viktor Yushchenko and
former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko on the first anniversary of the
revolution that propelled the one-time allies to power.

But Yushchenko lashed out at Tymoshenko after she used her time to make what
sounded like a political stump speech. Tears rolled down her cheeks.

"I swear to each of you, I am ready to do everything to restore our unity,"
a clearly frazzled Yushchenko told the crowd after a lengthy speech in which
he criticized Tymoshenko's economic policies.

Some in the crowd responded with whistles - a sign of disapproval - and
chants of "Yulia! Yulia!"

Yushchenko's government had billed Tuesday's festivities as a day to
celebrate the freedom they claim was the biggest achievement of their first
10 months in power. But the celebrations were tinged with disappointment for
many who expected the country to make a dramatic turnaround out of poverty
and corruption.

"We thought the revolution was a fight we'd win at once, but it turned out
to be only the first assault," said Tymoshenko, who split with Yushchenko
after he fired her in September.

Yushchenko again slammed her policies, which he claims brought this former
Soviet republic to the brink of economic collapse. But he also told the
crowd that Ukraine had accomplished much to be proud of during his time in
office.

"My friends, as president, I maintain that we are on the right path, a path
of justice, a path of freedom. ... We achieved things which no one before us
had, and I am proud of this," said Yushchenko, who was inaugurated in
January after winning a court-ordered rerun election.

In an interview with The Associated Press hours before the rally, Yushchenko
acknowledged there was still more work to be done but said "10 months is not
enough to change the country."

"To be in opposition against somebody and ... make good speeches is one
thing," he told AP. "To enter office and do what is sometimes a rather gray
job is another issue, but it is important this work be effective and
professional."

Yushchenko insisted that tasks remaining to be done, such as judicial reform
and eliminating corruption, involved problems he inherited. "They were not
created by Independence Square," Yushchenko said.

Last year's Independence Square protests, which broke out after election
officials in the previous pro-Moscow government robbed Yushchenko of his
victory, helped usher the opposition leader into power. Yushchenko rewarded
Tymoshenko for her help with the No. 2 job.

On Tuesday, wet snow fell heavily on the crowds, bundled up in orange
scarves as they listened to an array of pop groups and waited for Yushchenko
to make a speech - much as they had a year ago.

Chants of "Yu-shchen-ko! Yu-shchen-ko!" greeted the president, as he stepped
onto the stage surrounded by his family, all bedecked in orange.

Yushchenko, whose speech followed Tymoshenko's, greeted his former ally with
a kiss on the cheek. But when the crowd broke into chants of "Yulia" as
Yushchenko began speaking, he stopped and said: "Keep chanting 'Yulia'
again, I will listen, then I will start my speech." When they persisted in
chanting her name, Yushchenko snapped: "Be polite" and the crowd temporarily
grew silent.

Many in the crowd had hoped for a reconciliation. Politician after
politician called on the pair to reunite.

"Throw away your personal ambitions and interests, the people and Ukraine
must come before everything," said Vitali Klitschko, a newly retired world
heavyweight boxing champion and a possible Kiev mayoral candidate.

All to no avail. Tymoshenko made a stump speech, her eye on regaining the
prime minister's job after March elections.
Yushchenko responded with criticism. A crying Tymoshenko stood behind him,
her arms crossed.

Yushchenko, who defeated Kremlin-favored Viktor Yanukovych in the election,
had promised to bring Ukraine closer to the West and restore trust in
government. But a corruption scandal that touched some of his most senior
aides has left many Ukrainians feeling disenchanted.

"They didn't justify people's hopes, that's true, but we do have more
democracy now," said teacher Iryna Rytikova, who held an orange balloon.

Others were not so forgiving, and some left during Yushchenko's speech. "The
impression is that he's trying to persuade everyone and particularly himself
that everything is not so bad as it looks," said Dmytro Kundin, a
34-year-old businessman.

Interior Minister Yuriy Lustenko pleaded with the crowd not to feel
disillusioned. "Let all the disappointed remember why we stood here a year
ago ... not for salaries, pensions or a piece of sausage, not even for the
person whom we made a president _ but for freedom," he said.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated Press reporters Anna Melnichuk and Mara D. Bellaby
contributed to this report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
9. REVOLUTION IN UKRAINE: ONE YEAR ON.
WILL THE CIS TURN ORANGE?

OPINION & ANALYSIS: By Arseny Oganesyan,
RIA Novosti political commentator
Russian News & Information Agency, RIA Novosti
Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Nov 22, 2005

MOSCOW - On November 20, a year ago, Ukraine was shaken by an "orange
revolution," drawing the attention of the international community to events
in Kiev's Independence Square.

The West and Russia were concerned over the events, though their assessments
of them differed. But, just as RIA Novosti's experts predicted, the change
of power in Ukraine did not shift its geopolitical orientation from the East
to the West or improved the living standards of the people.

The "orange" team fell apart surprisingly quickly, within less than a year.
Vyacheslav Nikonov, a respected political scientist and a member of Russia's
Public Chamber, says it was logical: "All revolutions have the same results.

Firstly, each revolution devours its offspring - and the 'orange revolution'
has already done this. The bulk of revolutionary leaders have ceased to be
members of the cabinet and have joined the opposition (like Timoshenko,
Poroshenko, Zinchenko and many others)."

"Secondly," Nikonov said, "revolutions do not alleviate the burden of
tyranny but only shift it on somebody else's shoulders. I see no proof that
the current Ukrainian regime is more democratic than the government of
[Leonid] Kuchma. And thirdly, revolutions worsen the economic situation."

Nearly all experts polled by RIA Novosti pointed to Ukraine's economic
problems after the advance to power of Viktor Yushchenko.

Ukraine's Economic Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk said in early November that the
basic macroeconomic indexes were extremely low. Ukraine's GDP grew by 12.1%
in 2004 and only by 2.8% from January to September 2005, against the planned
8% for the whole year.

Yatsenyuk, who has only recently been appointed minister, explained the drop
in the economic growth rates by institutional interference in the economy.
According to him, this year, investment into the country's basic capital
dropped to 10% of last year's figure.

These changes affected the rating of President Yushchenko. The November poll
held by the Razumkov Center for Economic and Political Studies in all
regions of Ukraine shows that only 14.3% support the president, a decline of
32.4% since February 2005. And the level of public support for the Supreme
Rada (parliament) and the government is the lowest since the presidential
election.

As for the Western attitude to "orange revolutions" in general, Edward
Lozansky, president of the American University in Moscow, said that a year
after the "orange revolution" in Kiev the number of supporters of Bush's
doctrine of "spreading democracy throughout the world" was diminishing.

At the same time, a growing number of American politicians and citizens
wonder if support of the opposition forces in the CIS countries meets the
strategic interests of the United States, Lozansky said.

He wonders if it is reasonable to worsen relations with Russia by
interfering in the zone of its legitimate interests, instead of having it as
an ally in the global war on terror. Dr. Lozansky thinks that only by
forming a powerful American-Russian alliance can the two states win that
war.

And those who are trying to undermine the alliance are damaging the national
interests of their own countries, even though they act under the cover of
such noble words as "freedom" and "democracy," the expert said.

There are grounds to assume that some CIS countries may acquire the
revolutionary orange color soon. RIA Novosti's experts agree that the first
victim may be Belarus, on which the West is putting unbearable pressure.

Vyacheslav Igrunov, director of the International Institute of Humanitarian
and Political Studies, said that if Alexander Lukashenko left the post of
president for any reason, the country would slide into a "velvet revolution"
with the inevitable subsequent pro-Western change in the country's policy.
Vyacheslav Nikonov openly says, "Lukashenko will have very big problems
next year."

Sources in Moscow also think a revolutionary scenario can be enacted in
Armenia.

Belarus and Armenia are Russia's key allies in Eastern Europe and the South
Caucasus respectively. The West is most certainly involved in preparations
for dismantling the Lukashenko regime.

An indication of this is the numerous statements of Western politicians
about Lukashenko as the last dictator of Europe, and the funding of the
information and propaganda campaign against the Minsk authorities.

The situation with Armenia is more complicated. RIA Novosti's sources in
Moscow say that the West is searching for points of contact with members
of the Armenian political elite. The authors of some publications write in
the media about gradually squeezing Russia out of the South Caucasus,
including Armenia.

So, Russia and the West will not stop to be strong rivals in the post-Soviet
territory, at least until the next U.S. presidential election.

Moscow is fully aware of this, and by cleverly negotiating the signing of a
treaty on allied relations with Uzbekistan it has shown that it can pursue a
highly successful geopolitical game on its own.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and may not
necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
10. EUROPEAN UNION PRAISES UKRAINE'S ORANGE ANNIVERSARY

Agence France Presse (AFP), Brussels, Belgium, Tues, November 22 2005

BRUSSELS - Ukraine has made huge strides since last year's Orange
Revolution, but much remains to be done, the European Commission said
Tuesday.

The executive arm of the European Union, which Ukraine wants one day to
join, hailed the first anniversary of the uprising and reiterated that the
EU will continue to support Kiev.

"The new political reality in Ukraine was hard won through the courage and
determination of the people," said EU external relations commissioner Benita
Ferrero-Waldner.

"One year on, Ukraine can point to important progress, but there is still
much work to do. The EU will be there to support Ukraine's reform efforts
every step of the way."

Orange-clad crowds rallied in Kiev on Tuesday to mark the anniversary of
Ukraine's "orange revolution," the mass protests that ousted a pro-Russian
regime and installed pro-Western President Viktor Yushchenko.

Yushchenko said after taking power last year that joining the EU was a key
foreign policy priority.

"Those who took to the streets in peaceful demonstrations, were demanding
democracy, better government, and a chance for greater prosperity. The
European Union is helping Ukraine to achieve these goals," said
Ferrero-Waldner.

"We all have a duty to ensure that their aspirations for a better future are
not disappointed," she added. - (Sapa-AFP)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
11. FIRST ANNIVERSARY OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION
George Bush's Presidential Message

THE WHITE HOUSE, Office of the Press Secretary
Washington, D.C., Tuesday, November 22, 2005

FIRST ANNIVESARY OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION

I send greetings to those celebrating the first anniversary of the Orange
Revolution.

One year ago today, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian citizens stood
up to defend democracy in their homeland. Through great courage and
determination, they showed the world that the love of liberty is stronger
than the will of tyranny.

Last year's revolution was a powerful example of freedom and democracy
in action and an inspiration to those aspiring for freedom in their own
land.

Ukraine's leadership now faces an historic opportunity and has an historic
responsibility to fulfill the promise of the Orange Revolution and continue
to transform Ukraine into a fully democratic state.

The United States will continue to support the efforts of President Viktor
Yushchenko in advancing a democratic, prosperous, and secure Ukraine,
and America is proud to call Ukraine a friend.

Laura and I send our best wishes on this special occasion.

GEORGE W. BUSH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
12. UKRAINIANS COMMEMORATE FIRST ANNIVERSARY
OF THE ORANGE REVOLUTION

Associated Press (AP), Kiev, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

KIEV - Tens of thousands of Ukrainians, remembering last year's Orange
Revolution, flooded Kiev's main square on Tuesday to mark its first
anniversary with rock music, vodka toasts and fiery speeches.

The festivities were underlaid with disappointment for many who expected the
country would make a dramatic turnaround out of poverty and corruption. But
President Viktor Yushchenko, in a lengthy speech to the crowd, said Ukraine
had accomplished much to be proud of.

"We are on the right path, a path of justice, a path of freedom ... We
achieved things which no one before us had, and I am proud of this," he
said.

"Each of us paid for what we call freedom. I paid my price, each of you paid
your price," said Yushchenko, his face still pockmarked from the massive
dioxin poisoning he suffered during last year's bitterly contested campaign.

The scene resembled the massive gatherings that broke out Nov. 22, 2004, to
protest fraud in an election that Yushchenko purportedly lost. The gatherings,
which swelled above 100,000 at times, lasted until Yushchenko was inaugurated
in late January, having won a rerun of the election after the initial results were
annulled by the Supreme Court.

Snow fell heavily on the crowds, bundled up in scarves of orange as they
stood in Independence Square, listening to an array of pop groups and
waiting for Yushchenko to make a speech.

Chants of "Yushchenko! Yushchenko!" greeted the president, as he stepped
onto the stage surrounded by his family, all bedecked in orange.

"Let all the disappointed remember why we stood here a year ago ... not for
salaries, pensions or a piece of sausage, not even for the person whom we
made a president - but for freedom," Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko, one
of the leaders of last year's revolution, told the crowd.

Lutsenko and other speakers called on all members of the former Orange
Team to put aside quarrels and problems and reunite ahead of the March
parliamentary election.

Yushchenko, who defeated Kremlin-favored Viktor Yanukovych, promised
to bring Ukraine closer to the West and restore trust in this ex-Soviet
republic's government. But a corruption scandal that touched some of his
most senior aides earlier this year has left many Ukrainians feeling
disenchanted.

"They didn't justify people's hopes, that's true, but we do have more
democracy now," said school teacher Iryna Rytikova, who held an orange
balloon.

Yushchenko's party representatives handed out orange scarves in
Independence Square earlier in the day, and a huge screen showed videos
from last year's revolution.

Speaker after speaker promised to uphold the ideals of last year's protests,
but the square did not fully come alive until the arrival of Yushchenko's
one-time Orange Revolution ally and now-rival Yulia Tymoshenko.

With a roaring greeting, the heroine of last year's revolution - who became
prime minister but was fired by Yushchenko in September - urged her former
allies to reunite to prevent the losing presidential candidate, Viktor
Yanukovych, from returning to power in March parliamentary elections.

"We thought the revolution was a fight we'd win at once, but it turned out
to be only the first assault," Tymoshenko said, wearing just a hint of
orange on her ivory coat.

Yushchenko, whose speech followed Tymoshenko's, greeted his one-time
ally with a kiss on the cheek.

But when the crowd broke into chants of "Yulia" as Yushchenko began
speaking, he stopped and said: "Keep chanting 'Yulia' again, I will listen
then I will start my speech." When they persisted in chanting her name,
Yushchenko snapped: "Be polite" and the crowd grew silent.

Many in the crowd had hoped for a reconciliation between the one-time
allies. But after Tymoshenko used her time to make what sounded like a
political stump speech, Yushchenko responded by criticizing how she
had run the government. Tymoshenko stood behind him, her arms
crossed. She appeared to be crying. -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in a letter-to-the-editor today. Let us hear from you.
========================================================
13. HOW UKRAINE 'VERGED ON CIVIL WAR'

By Olexiy Solohubenko, BBC News, Kiev
BBC NEWS, United Kingdom, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

A year after Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" swept Viktor Yushchenko into
power new evidence has come to light about how tense the stand-off really
was.

Former officers of Ukraine's secret service, the SBU, told the BBC that
bloodshed had been avoided at the last minute.

They said fully armed troops were first ordered to confront the
demonstrators in Kiev's Independence Square but were then dramatically
told to go back to barracks 20 minutes later.

The then SBU head, Gen Ihor Smeshko, for the first time went public,
saying that civil war had been avoided only after intense negotiations
between representatives of the old cabinet of President Leonid Kuchma,
key figures in the opposition and several ambassadors.

Gen Smeshko said he had had to give a personal pledge that government
buildings would not be seized by the demonstrators, and only after this the
troops were ordered to withdraw by Ukraine's interior minister. "There were
hot heads on both sides who would stop at nothing in order to seize power,"
Gen Smeshko said.

He added that the biggest threat was not in some extremist groups trying to
seize or buy weapons, but in the real possibility of the conflict between
supporters of Mr Yushchenko and then Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych
spilling into the army and security services.

NEW POLITICAL TEST

A year after those dramatic events and just four months before parliamentary
elections, the party of the defeated Mr Yanukovych is leading in some
opinion polls.

Splits in the administration between President Yushchenko and the
charismatic former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko are destroying their
ratings and give Mr Yanukovych a chance to lead the government after the
May poll.

Officials close to Mr Yanukovych have privately told the BBC that he is
talking to the president every week. Mr Yushchenko's chief-of-staff does
not deny this, but says it is normal practice.

All these revelations will dismay not only supporters of the "Orange
Revolution" but also numerous pundits in Ukraine and in the West, who
had dismissed Mr Yanukovych after he dramatically lost the vote last year.

Once again, Ukraine is unfinished business and the ability of Ukrainians to
reach a compromise and avoid confrontation is going through a serious test.
As campaigning gets under way again the country of 48 million remains
deeply split. -30-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4459876.stm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
14. THE RING'S LOSS, UKRAINE'S GAIN
Vitali Klitschko, the WBC heavyweight champion of the world

COMMENTARY: By Gordon Marino
Financial Times, London, United Kingdom, Tue, Nov 22, 2005

The first time I met Mike Tyson he erupted and physically threatened a
fellow reporter. In my naiveté, I told him, "Stop degrading yourself, Mike.
What would Cus have thought of that?"

Mention of Cus D'Amato, Tyson's legendary trainer, might have caught him
with his emotional guard down, because a few minutes later he whispered,
"It's all about putting fannies in the seats."

"You're a great fighter," I protested, "and don't need to do that kind of
thing." The former champ laughed, rolled his shoulders and quipped,
"You'd be surprised."

Tyson was right, a boxer has to put on a sideshow in order to command
attention, at least in the US. Witness the case of Vitali Klitschko, the WBC
heavyweight champion of the world who has just retired on account of
repetitive knee and back injuries.

Despite the fact that the Ukrainian holds a doctorate, speaks four
languages, and was the most politically active boxer this side of Muhammad
Ali, the 34 year old Klitschko never captured the imagination of US fight
fans.

Tabbed Doctor Iron Fist, the 6'7" boxer who was an important figure in
support of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, had a record of 35 victories.
Remarkably all but one win came by way of knock out. A devastating puncher,
Klitschko's height and crab like movements, developed in his former career
as a world champion kick boxer, rendered him very difficult to hit.

Klitschko, whose younger brother, Wladimir (who also holds a doctorate) is a
top heavyweight contender, was the pugilist who sent champion Lennox Lewis
into retirement. In their 2003 encounter, Klitschko staggered Lewis with
right hands and was ahead on points when the bout was stopped due to a
severe laceration over Klitschko's left eye.

In his only other defeat, he was giving Chris Byrd a drubbing when Klitschko
tore his rotator cuff in the seventh round. Blind with pain and unable to
lift his arm, he threw in the towel after round nine.

The doyen of boxing commentators, Larry Merchant, who has since retracted
his comment, snapped that Klitschko lacked a certain part of the male
anatomy. Ominously enough, given the recent death of Leavander Johnson,
Merchant would later explain that Americans expect their heavyweights to be
willing to die in the ring.

As perceptive as he is powerful, Klitschko was profoundly puzzled by the
idea that US boxing fans would consider him a softie. And yet, as Merchant
himself acknowledged, "Vitali quickly learned to fight in an all or nothing
style."

After Lewis retired, Klitschko knocked out the power punching Corrie Sanders
to become WBC champ. He defended his title once, halting Danny Williams in
November 2004.

A showdown with top heavyweight contender Hasim Rahman was in the offing
but had to be postponed three times because of injuries Klitschko incurred in
training. Alas, the long awaited bout was set for November 12th. Klitschko
stood to earn in excess of US$7m dollars and Rahman more than US$4m.

However, toward the end of his training camp, Klitschko twisted his knee
which made the pivot required for punching impossible. Surgery was necessary
and rather than tie up the heavyweight division for another six months to a
year, Klitschko stepped aside at the very pinnacle of his powers.

Klitschko was actually not born in Ukraine but in Belovodsk, Kyrgyzstan, and
lists as his home towns Los Angeles, California and, in Germany, Hamburg.
Last March in New York, the influential Ukrainian Institute of America
honored he and his brother as Persons of the Year.

It was not just their stand in the Ukraine that ensured the award. They were
also involved in philanthropic efforts, including work for Unesco, anti-drug
campaigns, and helping to rebuild Kiev's St. Michael's cathedral, leveled by
Stalin.

Hundreds of well-heeled children of the Ukrainian diaspora were at the
awards dinner, scant few of these mostly suburbanites ardent boxing fans.
Yet, I got the strong sense that they do not miss a Klitschko bout.

When he stepped to the rostrum to accept his award, (his younger brother was
in Germany on a visit with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko) the throng
broke out into the chant that always resonates ringside at their bouts:
"Klitsch--ko, Klitsch--ko, Klitsch--ko".

He smiled, thanked the gathering and began his speech on the future of
Ukraine. After a few minutes, Vasal Kavatsiuk, the editor of the US and
Canadian Ukrainian-community newspaper Svoboda, whispered to me,
"And to think that he only learned Ukrainian a few years ago."

Kavatsiuk went on to say that the brothers are like Schwarzenegger in two
parts: Vitali is the politician, Wladimir, the actor.

Another guest ribbed me, "You are looking at the next president of Ukraine."
"Really?" I reacted in surprise. "Only kidding," he answered, paused and
then added, "Make that half kidding. Give him ten years."

He may already be on the way. Klitschko is running for mayor of Kiev next
year. -30-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Marino, a former boxer, is a professor of philosophy at St. Olaf
College in Northfield, Minnesota.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
15. UKRAINIAN ARTIST HNIZDOVSKY: OF MEN AND BEASTS
Lviv residents fulfill Yakiv Hnizdovsky's last request 20 years later

By Iryna YEHOROVA, The Day
The Day Weekly Digest in English, #37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

When the urn with Yakiv Hnizdovsky's ashes finally reached the land of
Ukraine, a number of people heaved a sigh of relief; they had fulfilled the
last request of an artist whose creative legacy (unlike his soul, and now
his ashes) mostly does not belong to Ukraine-and, unfortunately, most
likely never will.

US Ambassador to Ukraine John Herbst says that Hnizdovsky's works
are a valuable part of the collections of the finest American museums,
particularly the National Museum of American Art, Boston's Museum
of Fine Arts, and the White House collection.

Every day Herbst passes six of his canvases that hang in his office, and
they inspire him with a sense of universal harmony that each of us hopes
for.

In fact, Herbst was responsible for making the arrangements for the
urn to be transferred from the columbarium of the Episcopal Cathedral
of St. John the Divine in New York City to Lychakiv Cemetery in Lviv.

Diplomatic negotiations, correspondence, and red tape took 20 years.
"Do you think it was easy?" This question was addressed to me by
Roman Ferentsevych, who was a friend of the artist for 35 years and
who also helped in the efforts to transfer his remains to Ukraine.

But does Ukraine know Hnizdovsky?

Yakiv Hnizdovsky was born on Jan. 27, 1915, in Pylypche, a village in
Ternopil oblast. His talent for drawing was apparent when he was still in
grade school; in those days he did small sketches of people, landscapes,
and domestic animals.

In 1933 Hnizdovsky moved to Lviv and began taking active part in the
city's artistic life, joining the youth wing of the Association of
Independent Ukrainian Artists (ANUM).

Edward Kozak, an excellent cartoonist, arranged for him to do illustrations
for the Lviv newspaper Novy chas (New Time) and the magazine Komar
(The Mosquito).

The young graphic artist's talent was appreciated by Metropolitan Andrey
Sheptytsky, a philanthropist and keen expert on the arts. He gave
Hnizdovsky a scholarship, so that he could continue to study art.

In 1949 Hnizdovsky moved to the United States, where his first step on the
road to success was an award for a woodcut displayed at an exhibit of
graphics at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts. Another award for a painting
shown at a trade and industrial exhibit in Minnesota prompted him to move
to New York and concentrate on art.

He experimented for many years, searching for his own style. The life of an
immigrant was not easy, nor the road to recognition.

His quest for a leitmotif took a long time, until Hnizdovsky discovered the
beauty of ordinary things. From then on flora and fauna were predominant
in his creative work, in which portraits and landscapes figured very rarely.

The last exhibit of Hnizdovsky works, currently on display at the National
Museum in Lviv, includes works from the National Museum of Ukraine,
National Museum of Lviv, and the Ternopil Local History and Art museums
to which the artist's family in the faraway Diaspora kindly contributed his
works.

Although a great many institutions helped to organize the exhibit, it is not
large enough. Ukraine is only starting to learn about Hnizdovsky. -30-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://www.day.kiev.ua/153033/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
========================================================
16. ANNUAL ST. PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL UKRAINIAN GENOCIDE
COMMEMORATION ATTRACTS THOUSANDS

Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA)
New York, New York, Monday, November 21, 2005

NEW YORK - The annual national observance to commemorate the 72nd
Anniversary of the Ukrainian Genocide was held on Saturday, November 19,
2005 at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City.

The program began with a moving introduction by His Eminence Antony of the
Ukrainian Orthodox Church, where he described the recollections of an
elderly Genocide survivor and her guilt of having survived such an atrocity
and how necessary it is to inform everyone about the atrocities in Ukraine
in 1932-1933.

"Not only did her children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren," exclaimed
His Eminence, "but also her fellow parishioners, her neighbors, her
community, all became abundantly aware of not only how precious and holy
God-given life is, but also how easily people can be led astray, how easily
they can succumb to the demagoguery of one considered to be a "great"
leader, how easily the life - in particular the life of those not in favor -
can be devalued."

Cardinal Egan of the New York Roman Catholic Archdiocese also paid homage to
the victims of the Ukrainian Genocide. He greeted the gathering and
informed them that St. Patrick's Cathedral "is welcome to all to commemorate
this tragedy of the Ukrainian people."

Following the inspiring remarks by Cardinal Egan, His Excellency Basil
Losten of the Ukrainian Catholic Church and His Eminence Antony then
proceeded to co-celebrate an ecumenical requiem service (panakhyda) for the
repose of the souls of the Genocide victims. The Dumka Chorus of New York,
under the direction of Vasyl Hrechinsky, sang responses to the sacred
service.

Following the requiem prayer, Michael Sawkiw, Jr., President of the
Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, provided brief introductory
remarks. "It came at a time of no known natural calamity, pestilence, or
drought," stated Mr. Sawkiw. "It came at a time of 'supposed' peace between
the two world wars.But it also came at a time of subjugation of a tyrannical
empire over the freedom-loving Ukrainian nation - a genocide was born."

Amb. Valeriy Kuchinksy, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the United
Nations delivered remarks from the President of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko.
In his address to those gathered, the Ukrainian President expressed "special
words of gratitude to the American nation, which was the first to recognize
the terrible consequences of the Holodomor of 1932-1933. I hope that this
tragedy will be recognized also by the entire international community."

The former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Hennadiy Udovenko also
participated in the program and spoke to those gathered at St. Patrick's
Cathedral. He mentioned the first anniversary of the "Orange Revolution"
and how the Ukrainian nation awoke to become masters of their own fate.

Much like President Yushchenko, the Honorable Hennadiy Udovenko cordially
thanked "the Ukrainian Diaspora in the United States for their strong
position to attract U.S. and worldwide attention to this awful tragedy of
the Ukrainian people."

President George Bush also sent greetings to the annual commemorative event.
The UCCA President read the greetings in its full text to the gathering.

Following the presidential greeting, Mr. Sawkiw informed those assembled
that days earlier, the House of Representatives unanimously adopted a bill
authorizing the construction of a monument on federal land in the District
of Columbia to the victims of the Ukrainian Genocide, to be constructed by
2008 - the 75th Anniversary of the Ukrainian Genocide.

He then proceeded to read a few remarks offered by Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI),
co-chair of the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus, and sponsor of HR562, a bill
authorizing the construction of a monument in Washington, DC. "This
legislation is important for all of humanity," stated Rep. Levin in his
remarks on the House floor. "It is very important to the 1.5 million
Ukrainian Americans.it has special meaning to the people of Ukraine who have
embarked on a courageous effort to build a free, democratic, open society,
and indeed to all of us who value freedom."

Of particular interest were remarks delivered by Mr. Nigel Colley,
grandnephew of Gareth Jones, a Western journalist who exposed the true
nature of the genocidal famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933. "To the list of the
millions of Ukrainian peasants who lost their lives due to Stalin's man-made
famine," Mr. Colley stated, "the name of the only Welshman, my great uncle,
Gareth Jones should perhaps now be added.

Newly discovered evidence at the British Public Records Office points the
finger of blame for Gareth's murder in 1935 in the direction of Moscow,
quite probably in retribution for his international exposure of the
Holodomor. and whose only crime was his dogged pursuit of truth." Mr.
Colley continued to describe episodes of Gareth Jones' travels throughout
Ukraine and how he witnessed and documented the Genocide.

Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York, also issued an Executive
Proclamation in remembrance of the victims of the Ukrainian Genocide.
Excerpts from the text were read by Mr. Sawkiw.

His Excellency Basil Losten concluded the commemorative ceremony by
thanking all the participants and expressing his hope that the world shall never
forget about the horrors the Ukrainian nation suffered because of who they
were. "A Prayer for Ukraine" was sung by the Dumka Chorus to close the
program. -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
17. A GIFT FROM AMERICA
Jackson-Vanik amendment repealed by half

By Serhiy SOLODKY, The Day
The Day Weekly Digest in English, #37
Kyiv, Ukraine, Tuesday, November 22, 2005

US has made a present to Ukraine. Even if being half of what it could have
been, this kind of support extended to Kyiv is noteworthy. The US Senate
unanimously voted for the repeal of the Jackson-Vanik amendment last
weekend. The next step is action by the House of Representatives and
finally the US President's signature.

Few if any doubt that the senators' initiative will be supported on both
levels. It is just a matter of time. The more so that the US
parliamentarians have had ample opportunity to weigh the pros and cons.

The Jackson-Vanik amendment was included in the 1974 Trade Act to
pressure the Soviet Union to permit free emigration, using punitive foreign
trade tariffs and taxes. However, neither the USSR's collapse nor Ukraine's
independence could make Congress change its attitude.

With the coming of political forces to power in Ukraine that are treated in
a marked friendly manner by Washington, one would expect the amendment
to be repealed there and then. We still vividly remember the US
parliamentarians giving a standing ovation after Viktor Yushchenko's speech
on April 6 this year. And how US congressmen applauded in response to
the Ukrainian president's appeal for cancellation of the Jackson-Vanik
amendment: "... take this step toward Ukraine, break down this wall."

True, the amendment as such had long been on paper only and Congress
would renew it every year for another year as proposed by the White House.
This fact was even more perplexing because the amendment remaining formally
effective meant not so much that the US parliamentarians somehow never got
around to making the required decision, as that making the decision had to
do with other issues.

US Ambassador John Herbst told The Day on July 5 that Ukraine, of course,
had many friends in Congress. A great many of them wanted the amendment
repealed, but there were other interests to be kept in mind. He cited the US
legislative practice whereby an amendment would be repealed several weeks
prior to a given country being admitted to the WTO. Ukraine's WTO
membership in the near future is not on the agenda.

Then why did Congress make the decision? Maybe they decided to make
Ukraine an exception from the rule, the more so that the decision coincided
in time with the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution. Needless to
say,
Kyiv accepted this present with gratification.

The Ukrainian foreign ministry stressed that "It is a long-awaited measure
that removes a problem from the Ukrainian-US agenda as a hangover of the
cold war that did not conform to the spirit of Ukrainian- American strategic
partnership." It is possible that the positive decision was facilitated by
the Ukrainian government's active endeavors.

A coalition of sorts formed in the US recently, made up of former US
ambassadors Stephen Pifer and William Miller. Among other things they
worked on repealing the amendment. Until recently experts noted the
absence of a strong lobby support in the US, but it then appeared as an
ex-ambassadorial alliance.

After all, the West (the US in particular) had to prove their support of
reforms in Ukraine by practical deeds. If not demonstrated on a level such
as repealing the amendment, it would be hard to discuss any other projects
on a larger scale.

The Day asked former US Congressman John B. CONLAN, currently
President of Conlan & Associates LLC, doing investment consulting in
Kyiv.

[Q] Is it possible that the House of Representatives will automatically
support the repeal of the Jackson-Vanik amendment?

[A] It should. I don't know if they legislate this week. This Thursday is
Thanksgiving, so the congressmen will go home for vacation and there will
be no meetings. I was originally co-sponsor of the Jackson-Vanik convent
bill.

I agree that it should be repealed. It has no effect right now because year
by year the president is suspending the enforcement of that bill. But
psychologically it's nice to have it permanently removed.

[Q] Why didn't they do so earlier?

[A] Because the Ukraine's government had no effective lobbying operation
in Washington. They think if they just go and give the speech that's all
that
is necessary. The congressmen have hundreds of bills and proposals to
work on. Until now there wasn't any organized push by the Ukrainian side.
There's been strong support for Ukraine in America.

The problem is the Rada. They don't pass any WTO legislation, they don't
pass any anti-corruption laws. What kind of a message does this send to the
world?

[Q] One could describe the Senate's decision as a gift for Ukraine on the
eve of the first anniversary of the Orange Revolution.

[A] Sure. It's in sense a vote of confidence in the government and the
direction the people and the national government are taking here. The
changes in Ukraine are positive, but they need to go faster. There is many
more changes are needed to bring Ukraine's government into the twenty-
first century.

I think that the investment climate in Ukraine is now much better compared
to what we had a year ago. I think everyone agrees with this. -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://www.day.kiev.ua/153002/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
Send in names and e-mail addresses for the AUR distribution list.
========================================================
18. UKRAINE GRADUATED FROM JACKSON-VANIK AMENDMENT

The Federation of Jewish Communities of the CIS (FJC)
Moscow & New York, Tuesday, November 22 2005

KIEV, Ukraine - After much petitioning by political leaders of Ukraine
and support on the part of international Jewish groups, Ukraine has finally
graduated out of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment [U.S. Senate only],
introduced in 1974 by the U.S. Government. This dated bill imposed
trade restrictions, linking trade to the willingness of Soviet-bloc countries
to permit Jews to emigrate.

On Friday, the Senate passed the vote on a bill introduced by Senator
Richard Lugar by unanimous consent. It will now proceed to consideration
by the House of Representatives.

While successive U.S. administrations have annually waived the Jackson-
Vanik requirements since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, this latest
occurrence holds promise that Ukraine will become exempt from this
limiting amendment once and for all.

Chief Rabbi of Ukraine Azriel Chaikin noted on this occasion the great
importance of this development. "For the past 14 years, since the
unraveling of the U.S.S.R., Ukraine as a state has maintained a strong
record in allowing its Jews to pursue immigration, to wherever they
wanted and whenever they wished to go," explained Rabbi Chaikin.

"As the Chief rabbi of Ukraine I congratulate the Ukrainian government on
this great achievement. We now hope our government will make similar
strides in the fight against anti-Semitism, xenophobia and national and
religious hatred," added Ukraine's Chief Rabbi.

Jewish groups, including the NCSJ Advocates on Behalf of Jews in
Russia, Ukraine, the Baltic States and Eurasia have been very involved in
a broad-ranging coalition that has been actively pushing for U.S. law-
makers to pass a bill that would graduate Ukraine from an edict deemed
to be redundant.

The Federation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine, which concentrates its
efforts on advancing the life of Jewish communities across Ukraine, also
embraces what constitutes an important step in recognizing the significant
progress that has been made with respect to Jews of Ukraine, not to mention
the existence of religious freedom and upholding other values of democratic
society. -30-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINK: http://www.fjc.ru/news/newsArticle.asp?AID=328797
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[return to index] [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR"
An Agent Of Change
A Free, Not-for-profit, Independent, Public Service Newsletter
ARTICLES ARE FOR PERSONAL AND ACADEMIC USE ONLY
Articles are Distributed For Information, Research, Education
Discussion and Personal Purposes Only
========================================================
NOTE: The new book, "Day and Eternity of James Mace"
published by The Day in Kyiv, in English or in Ukrainian, is available
from the www.ArtUkraine.com Information Service. If you are
interesting in finding out how to order the new book please send an
e-mail to ArtUkraine.com@starpower.net. EDITOR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: The Ukrainian Federation of America (UFA) will be assisting
in the famine/holodomor/genocide commemorations in Kyiv during
November of this year. The Federation needs to raise several thousand
dollars for expenses related to the Holodomor Exhibition to be held in
the Ukrainian House. Donations can be made out to the Ukrainian
Federation of America and sent to the Federation at 930 Henrietta
Avenue, Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006. Please designate your donation
for the Dr. James Mace Memorial Holodomor Fund. EDITOR
========================================================
UKRAINE INFORMATION WEBSITE: http://www.ArtUkraine.com
========================================================
SigmaBleyzer/Bleyzer Foundation Economic Reports
"SigmaBleyzer - Where Opportunities Emerge"
The SigmaBleyzer Private Equity Investment Group offers a comprehensive
collection of documents, reports and presentations presented by its business
units and organizations. All downloads are grouped by categories:
Marketing; Economic Country Reports; Presentations; Ukrainian Equity Guide;
Monthly Macroeconomic Situation Reports (Romania, Bulgaria, Ukraine).
LINK: http://www.sigmableyzer.com/index.php?action=downloads
You can be on an e-mail distribution list to receive automatically, on a
monthly basis, any or all of the Macroeconomic Situation Reports (Romania,
Bulgaria, Ukraine) by sending an e-mail to mwilliams@SigmaBleyzer.com.
"UKRAINE - A COUNTY OF NEW OPPORTUNITIES"
========================================================
"WELCOME TO UKRAINE" &
"NARODNE MYSTETSTVO" MAGAZINES
UKRAINIAN MAGAZINES: For information on how to subscribe to the
"Welcome to Ukraine" magazine in English, published four times a year
and/or to the Ukrainian Folk Art magazine "Narodne Mystetstvo" in
Ukrainian, published two times a year, please send an e-mail to:
ArtUkraine.com@starpower.net.
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT- AUR" - SPONSORS
"Working to Secure & Enhance Ukraine's Democratic Future"

1. THE BLEYZER FOUNDATION, Dr. Edilberto Segura, Chairman;
Victor Gekker, Executive Director, Kyiv, Ukraine; Washington, D.C.,
http://www.bleyzerfoundation.com.
Additional supporting sponsors for the Action Ukraine Report (AUR) are:
2. UKRAINIAN FEDERATION OF AMERICA (UFA), Zenia Chernyk,
Chairperson; Vera M. Andryczyk, President; Huntingdon Valley,
Pennsylvania
3. KIEV-ATLANTIC GROUP, David and Tamara Sweere, Daniel
Sweere, Kyiv and Myronivka, Ukraine, 380 44 298 7275 in Kyiv,
kau@ukrnet.net
4. ESTRON CORPORATION, Grain Export Terminal Facility &
Oilseed Crushing Plant, Ilvichevsk, Ukraine
5. Law firm UKRAINIAN LEGAL GROUP, Irina Paliashvili, President;
Kiev and Washington, general@rulg.com, www.rulg.com.
6. BAHRIANY FOUNDATION, INC., Dr. Anatol Lysyj, Chairman,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
7. VOLIA SOFTWARE, Software to Fit Your Business, Source your
IT work in Ukraine. Contact: Yuriy Sivitsky, Vice President, Marketing,
Kyiv, Ukraine, yuriy.sivitsky@softline.kiev.ua; Volia Software website:
http://www.volia-software.com/ or Bill Hunter, CEO Volia Software,
Houston, TX 77024; bill.hunter@volia-software.com.
8. ODUM- Association of American Youth of Ukrainian Descent,
Minnesota Chapter, Natalia Yarr, Chairperson
9. UKRAINE-U.S. BUSINESS COUNCIL, Washington, D.C.,
Dr. Susanne Lotarski, President/CEO; E. Morgan Williams,
SigmaBleyzer, Chairman, Executive Committee, Board of Directors;
John Stephens, Cape Point Capital, Secretary/Treasurer
10. UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COORDINATING COUNCIL (UACC),
Ihor Gawdiak, President, Washington, D.C., New York, New York
11. U.S.-UKRAINE FOUNDATION (USUF), Nadia Komarnyckyj
McConnell, President; John Kun, Vice President/COO; Vera
Andruskiw, CPP Wash Project Director, Washington, D.C.; Markian
Bilynskyj, VP/Director of Field Operations; Marta Kolomayets, CPP
Kyiv Project Director, Kyiv, Ukraine. Web: http://www.USUkraine.org
12. WJ Grain, Kyiv, Ukraine, David Holpert, Chief Financial Officer,
Chicago, Illinois.
========================================================
"THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT - AUR" is an in-depth, private,
independent, not-for- profit news and analysis international newsletter,
produced as a free public service by the non-profit www.ArtUkraine.com
Information Service (ARTUIS) and The Action Ukraine Report Monitoring
Service The report is distributed in the public's interesting around the
world FREE of charge. Additional readers are always welcome.
TO GET ON OR OFF THE DISTRIBUTION LIST
If you would like to read "THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT- AUR"
please send your name, country of residence, and e-mail contact
information to morganw@patriot.net. Additional names are welcome. If
you do not wish to read "THE ACTION UKRAINE REPORT" around
five times per week, let us know by e-mail to morganw@patriot.net. If
you are receiving more than one copy please contact us and again please
contact us immediately if you do not wish to receive this Report.
===================================================
PUBLISHER AND EDITOR - AUR
Mr. E. Morgan Williams, Director, Government Affairs
Washington Office, SigmaBleyzer Private Equity Investment Group
P.O. Box 2607, Washington, D.C. 20013, Tel: 202 437 4707
Mobile in Kyiv: 8 050 689 2874
mwilliams@SigmaBleyzer.com; www.SigmaBleyzer.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director, Ukrainian Federation of America (UFA)
Coordinator, Action Ukraine Coalition (AUC)
Senior Advisor, U.S.-Ukraine Foundation (USUF)
Chairman, Executive Committee, Ukraine-U.S. Business Council
Publisher, Ukraine Information Website, www.ArtUkraine.com
Member, International Ukrainian Holodomor Committee
=======================================================
Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
=======================================================

return to index [The Action Ukraine Report (AUR) Monitoring Service]
=======================================================